By MAMAMIA TEAM
This is a cause for celebration: the Prime Minister has committed to lifting childhood immunisation rates.
The government announced the beginning of its immunisation campaign last year, when they mandated that parents would have to ensure that all children were fully immunised in order to receive the Family Tax Benefit at the end of the financial year. The family tax benefit supplement can come to more than $2000.
However, in the past, parents were able to apply for exemptions for their children, and still receive the benefit. These exemptions were allowed on medical, religious, and “conscientious objector” grounds.
Kevin Rudd will today announce that, if re-elected, the Labor party will institute a policy that will require all children to be fully immunised – and conscientious objections will no longer be regarded as a legitimate reason to not vaccinate your child.
Going forward, only religious and medical exemptions will apply.
This means that parents who have been exposed to the scare-mongering of the anti-vaccination organisation Australian Vaccination Network, or have been misled by misinformation, will not be able to exempt their child from receiving the immunisation – and still receive the payment.
News Corp reported Kevin Rudd as saying, “The science cannot be disputed. Immunisation is the safest and most effective way for parents to protect their children from disease, and one of the most important public health measures at our disposal.”
Earlier this year, a report from the National Health Performance Authority revealed just how low vaccination rates among children were in some areas of Australia. Although throughout most of Australia vaccination rates sit at approximately 90 per cent, the NHPA revealed that there was still a need to increase rates to ensure protection for children and newborns.
Of greater concern, it was also revealed that in some communities upwards of 1 in 5 children children (that’s 20 per cent) were not fully immunised. This puts children in those areas at significant risk of meningitis, measles and whooping cough. Mamamia covered the NHPA report extensively, and broke down the statistics here.
Kevin Rudd’s pledge to list vaccination rates is completely necessary – because across Australia, more than 77,000 children are not fully immunised. That’s a scary fact, because vaccination effectiveness relies on ‘herd immunity’ to prevent outbreaks of incurable – but preventable – diseases.
And when rates of un-immunised children in any area are particularly high, that increases the chances of there being outbreak. As Mamamia’s publisher and pro-vaccination campaigner Mia Freedman explains:
Let’s be very clear. Those who refuse to immunise their children are not just risking their own children’s health but the lives of others in the community. Vaccinations are not perfect – occasionally, those who have been immunised can still contract the disease – but they are the best we’ve got to protect us against incurable diseases.
We all rely on the immunity of others to protect us, particularly those who are too young to be immunised and anyone with an illness that suppresses their immune system (such as cancer). They are our most vulnerable and high levels of immunisation in the community (above 95%) are crucial for their welfare.
This is why the Australian government needs to commit to ensuring that all Australian children are vaccinated. And this is also why parents, carers and members of the community need to ensure that they themselves receive necessary booster shots.
The fact remains that there’s still more that can be done. A religious objection to vaccination remains, and state and federal governments could still be doing more to promote booster shots for adults.
Kevin Rudd has made a good start, but he may not be re-elected come September. For this measure to take effect, Tony Abbott needs to commit to a similar policy. And so he should – because this issue is above politics.
Because vaccinations are how we can most effectively protect our children from these diseases. Prevention is the only cure.
Please share to show your support for stricter regulations regarding vaccinations – and to support further changes to vaccination policy that will continue to protect our children.
Top Comments
it is sad that this is an attack on children. there are plenty of adults who are out in the community who arent vaccinated - and they especially do not meet the very long schedule that is expected of children today. how many adults have had every shot on the schedule, AND get their boosters regularly?
I'm so sick of this. I do not vaccinate my children anymore because my second son became gravely ill, paralysed, couldn't eat for 4 days,etc after his first vaccination. The vaccinations are not safe for every child - period.
That said - I am not against vaccinations per say, just that we haven't got it right. Why doesn't anyone have the conversation about what it would take for parents that aren't vaccinating their children to take a second look.
A few things could be done that I am sure would encourage more parents to vaccinate their children, but no one seems to really care or have that conversation.
We have gone too far! I may reconsider if I could stage or be selective about which vaccinations i could get for my children, but that choice isn't available.
To take the whooping cough as a popular example - I would be more inclined to get that for my children if it wasn't lumped in with a shot that has a total of 6 diseases in it, which I believe puts unnecessary load on an underdeveloped immune system.
Why are we so insistent on immunising for things like chicken pox when nations like the uk don't deem it a disease dangerous enough to immunise against?
Heb b in the first hour of a new born baby's life - really?
I'm sorry but when it comes to the lives of my children I do not accept "it's my way or the highway" attitude.
Make them safer, make them available for individual shots so that concerned parents can space them out or be selective , get real about which vaccinations our children really need.
Vaccination is not perfect. It's sad when things go wrong - like when people die in a crash... because the air bag hit them too hard or because their seat belt trapped them in a burning vehicle. It's crappy, truly crappy that things that are meant to save us, to make our lives better, end up hurting us. But that doesn't mean we should never use anything that isn't absolutely 100% perfectly risk free. Nothing is.
The alternative is to accept the much bigger risk of not using those things. How is that better?
"We have gone too far! I may reconsider if I could stage or be selective about which vaccinations i could get for my children, but that choice isn’t available. "
Individual shots would multiply the risk, and anxiety, by several orders, not lower it.
"Make them safer"
Do you think no one works on vaccine research any more? The current whooping cough vaccine is different to the one before it. We use it even though it's less effective - because it's safer. Someone worked on that, found a way to make it safer and it was adopted. Now anti-vaxxers complain that it doesn't work very well.
Science isn't a religion. It's not magic. Someone doesn't just throw a lab coat on, snap their fingers and "hey presto, amen", problem solved. If you know how to make vaccines safer and more effective and how to determine who will react badly before vaccinating them, then you need to publish that information.
And what makes you think our kids don't need the vaccinations recommended for them? They don't get vaccinated for smallpox any more, because they don't need it. Which others would you suggest be dropped. Explain why.