By MAMAMIA TEAM
This is a cause for celebration: the Prime Minister has committed to lifting childhood immunisation rates.
The government announced the beginning of its immunisation campaign last year, when they mandated that parents would have to ensure that all children were fully immunised in order to receive the Family Tax Benefit at the end of the financial year. The family tax benefit supplement can come to more than $2000.
However, in the past, parents were able to apply for exemptions for their children, and still receive the benefit. These exemptions were allowed on medical, religious, and “conscientious objector” grounds.
Kevin Rudd will today announce that, if re-elected, the Labor party will institute a policy that will require all children to be fully immunised – and conscientious objections will no longer be regarded as a legitimate reason to not vaccinate your child.
Going forward, only religious and medical exemptions will apply.
This means that parents who have been exposed to the scare-mongering of the anti-vaccination organisation Australian Vaccination Network, or have been misled by misinformation, will not be able to exempt their child from receiving the immunisation – and still receive the payment.
News Corp reported Kevin Rudd as saying, “The science cannot be disputed. Immunisation is the safest and most effective way for parents to protect their children from disease, and one of the most important public health measures at our disposal.”
Earlier this year, a report from the National Health Performance Authority revealed just how low vaccination rates among children were in some areas of Australia. Although throughout most of Australia vaccination rates sit at approximately 90 per cent, the NHPA revealed that there was still a need to increase rates to ensure protection for children and newborns.
Top Comments
it is sad that this is an attack on children. there are plenty of adults who are out in the community who arent vaccinated - and they especially do not meet the very long schedule that is expected of children today. how many adults have had every shot on the schedule, AND get their boosters regularly?
I'm so sick of this. I do not vaccinate my children anymore because my second son became gravely ill, paralysed, couldn't eat for 4 days,etc after his first vaccination. The vaccinations are not safe for every child - period.
That said - I am not against vaccinations per say, just that we haven't got it right. Why doesn't anyone have the conversation about what it would take for parents that aren't vaccinating their children to take a second look.
A few things could be done that I am sure would encourage more parents to vaccinate their children, but no one seems to really care or have that conversation.
We have gone too far! I may reconsider if I could stage or be selective about which vaccinations i could get for my children, but that choice isn't available.
To take the whooping cough as a popular example - I would be more inclined to get that for my children if it wasn't lumped in with a shot that has a total of 6 diseases in it, which I believe puts unnecessary load on an underdeveloped immune system.
Why are we so insistent on immunising for things like chicken pox when nations like the uk don't deem it a disease dangerous enough to immunise against?
Heb b in the first hour of a new born baby's life - really?
I'm sorry but when it comes to the lives of my children I do not accept "it's my way or the highway" attitude.
Make them safer, make them available for individual shots so that concerned parents can space them out or be selective , get real about which vaccinations our children really need.
Vaccination is not perfect. It's sad when things go wrong - like when people die in a crash... because the air bag hit them too hard or because their seat belt trapped them in a burning vehicle. It's crappy, truly crappy that things that are meant to save us, to make our lives better, end up hurting us. But that doesn't mean we should never use anything that isn't absolutely 100% perfectly risk free. Nothing is.
The alternative is to accept the much bigger risk of not using those things. How is that better?
"We have gone too far! I may reconsider if I could stage or be selective about which vaccinations i could get for my children, but that choice isn’t available. "
Individual shots would multiply the risk, and anxiety, by several orders, not lower it.
"Make them safer"
Do you think no one works on vaccine research any more? The current whooping cough vaccine is different to the one before it. We use it even though it's less effective - because it's safer. Someone worked on that, found a way to make it safer and it was adopted. Now anti-vaxxers complain that it doesn't work very well.
Science isn't a religion. It's not magic. Someone doesn't just throw a lab coat on, snap their fingers and "hey presto, amen", problem solved. If you know how to make vaccines safer and more effective and how to determine who will react badly before vaccinating them, then you need to publish that information.
And what makes you think our kids don't need the vaccinations recommended for them? They don't get vaccinated for smallpox any more, because they don't need it. Which others would you suggest be dropped. Explain why.