You know that last pay rise you received? Well, what would you say to your boss if they asked you to pay it back now – just two and half weeks before Christmas?
Yeah. That. Not sure we could print our reaction here without disappointing our parents.
But that’s the situation facing the staff of 1100 childcare centres around Australia today.
Back in May, the Gillard Govenement awarded workers with a Certificate 111 qualification, an extra $3 dollars an hour, and those with a teaching qualification, an extra $6 an hour.
Today the Abbott Government has announced that they want workers to pay that money back.
MERRY CHRISTMAS.
The money was provided via a $300 million fund, set up for the next two years. During which time, the Fair Work Commission would undertake a study to determine whether the rates of pay in the sector were too low.
After a long and successful campaign, many in the sector were fearful that an Abbott Government would overturn this decision and take the funds as savings. These fears seemed unfounded when it was promised that all existing commitments would be guaranteed by a newly elected Prime Minister and his team.
But it wasn’t to be. A decision to re-direct the funds into professional development was announced.
This shows a complete lack of understanding of the current nature of the child care sector. One that has undergone an unprecedented period of professionalisation in the last six years.
As if that’s not bad enough. The Government decided to ask staff to pay back the money already received under the existing agreement.
Top Comments
My wife is a childcare Director,
Although I think she should get paid more for the responsibility she carries , I do not believe it should be taxpayers money being used.
The wages need to be negotiated through the Fair Work Commission or directly with Employers.
The Labor party was unashamedly using the childcare Industry to set up a Union cash cow (slush fund), shamelessly telling them if they unionize the taxpayers cash will be handed out. And those who don't unionize??
Also the Labor party legislating that all Child care workers need Uni degrees is ridiculous , there are thousands of women in their 30's and 40's who would be great part time or casual child care workers but now can't unless they are prepared to get a degree.
The old system with only supervisors needing a degree was sufficient (and cheaper for families).
1) Since the 1990s enterprise agreements are no longer required to involve a union. They can be made bilaterally between employers and staff and in the childcare sector union membership is lower than average membership levels across the economy. Therefore its not necessarily unionised workers that would have benefited from the scheme and thus the program was not necessarily a slush fund.
2) Yes ONE union was pressuring childcare workers to unionise by emphasising that to be on the receiving end of the scheme you must be unionised. However, there are another four unions in the sector that didn't engage in this kind of behaviour. One unions dodgy behaviour is not representative of the govts or other unions.
3) The quality of child care in Australia is well below that of other developed nations and research has shown that a lack of qualified staff is a contributing factor. Not to mention higher staff turnover due to dissatisfaction with the low pay.
Childcare workers get paid enough already, how about increasing the pay of nurses and ambulance staff instead, the one's who DON'T actually get paid enough
Really? We get paid enough? Wow! Must of missed that moment. As the HIGHEST qualified rate I can be in my industry I get paid less then the unqualified, untrained stackers of shelfs in supermarkets. I don't doubt the wonderful job nurses do and yes they deserve to be paid more but so do we. Or else if or when you have children don't whine that they are being TEACHED by a teenager who while qualified has no experience and does not know how to teach or control her class....
Supermarket stackers and childcare workers are completely different industries so they cannot be compared. If someone chooses to send their child to childcare that is their decision and if they don't like the job that someone is doing there they aren't obligated to keep their child there.
And not paid enough? I know someone who is fully qualified and earns a $1000 a week, that's $200 less than a senior worker at Telstra, give or take the area of expertise. They are definitely paid enough and if you're not you're obviously working for the wrong person or company.
Lol I think that person is lying to you. Been in industry 13 years and nobody I know in many companies are paid that much....
Pay slips don't lie, sorry.