I’m an early childhood educator. And today’s child care changes have left me, and educators Australia-wide extremely concerned about disadvantaged children.
The new child care subsidy leaves many families worse off on both ends of the spectrum, but disadvantaged families are being hurt the most by far. The number of subsidised hours for disadvantaged families has been drastically cut.
I’ve worked in childcare centres in both affluent and low socio-economic areas.
When I worked with children at risk, my colleagues and I were often the only members of the community who would see them regularly outside of their families.
In the old model these children were under our care two days a week, so we could really get to know every child and notice any changes in their well-being. Where necessary, we could escalate any concerns and work with families to ensure that no child was left behind.
Top Comments
I gather from this article that child care centres are teaching children how to read and write, or perhaps a second language? Otherwise, why are they calling themselves educators?
Yes. My eldest son is currently learning Japanese, and my toddler twins have around 20 words in baby sign language that they had learnt before their first birthday. They learn sharing and conflict resolution in large groups (scenarios i obviously cannot replicate at home), they do science experiments, art, music and have fun with imaginative play. So yes, they have earned the right to be called educators, and i will keep repeating that to anyone who denigrates the wonderful people who are helping us raise our children
They do teach kids to read and write? Our daycare has an early childhood teacher running the kindy program for 3-4 year olds. I believe this is the standard across daycares?
Yes, they certainly do. They do a brilliant job and work to a curriculum just like other educators.