lifestyle

Government announces major changes to childcare system.

By ABC political correspondent Emma Griffiths

Most families will receive more help with childcare costs under the Abbott Government’s major budget initiative, but the boost will come at the expense of some new parents and families with one parent staying at home.

The Federal Government wants to encourage parents to do more paid work and has unveiled a plan aimed at making childcare more affordable.

Under the changes, families with household incomes up to $165,000 will be better off by $30 a week and even those earning more than $185,000 will receive more assistance.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott said the measures will lead to 240,000 families increasing their hours in paid employment, including almost 38,000 jobless families.

“We are changing the economics of going back to work so that we will get more work, so that families will have more opportunities to increase their income,” he said.

But the extra spending of $3.5 billion over four years is contingent on the Senate passing cuts in last year’s budget to Family Tax Benefits, including stopping payments entirely to single-income families when children turn six.

“Unless we offset this new spending it cannot go ahead,” Mr Abbott said.

Social Services Minister Scott Morrison said the proposals would have to “wash their own face fiscally”.

“We are not going to tax Peter, Paul and Mary to support new investment,” he said.

It sets the scene for more high-stakes negotiations with the crossbench in the Senate, with Labor ruling out any support for the cuts.

“Children don’t get cheaper when they turn six,” shadow treasurer Chris Bowen told Insiders.

“It just makes no sense. We didn’t support it then, we won’t be supporting it now, we won’t be supporting these cuts in the future.”

Stay-at-home parents with a household income of over $65,000 will also lose all childcare subsidies.

No more ‘double-dipping’ says Hockey.

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has slammed the tactic as “blackmail” and is worried about the tougher work activity test to get subsidised childcare.

Under the new regime parents must do eight hours a fortnight of work, study or training to qualify for any childcare support.

“If they really want mums to be able to ease themselves back into the workforce they’ve got to be given those guaranteed childcare support places upfront,” she said.

“How do you go to a job interview if you’ve got nowhere to put your child while you’re there?”

New parents will also lose out in the families package, with the Government cutting access to the taxpayer funded, minimum wage paid parental leave scheme for those who can access maternity leave through work.

Treasurer Joe Hockey, who described it as “patently unfair” and “double-dipping”, said the change will save nearly $1 billion over the next four years and affect thousands of people.

It means primary carers — usually women — will not be able to use the payments to stay at home with their new babies for an extra 18 weeks.

The change is a dramatic reduction from the Prime Minister’s once-signature PPL policy, which had promised full wage replacement for women up to $50,000 plus superannuation for six months — until it was dropped by Mr Abbott in February.

“If you are serious about fairness, you should support this change,” Mr Abbott said.

Families spokeswoman Jenny Macklin has slammed the Government for the parental leave cut.

“This really does just show, this Government does not understand the pressures families are under,” she said.

Childcare groups call for detail, immediate help.

Early Childhood Australia, the peak early childhood lobby group, has welcomed the “historic reform” but has also warned the new activity test for parents could exclude children in need.

“We are concerned that workforce participation objectives have been placed ahead of the interests of children,” chief executive Samantha Page said in a statement.

“It is often the children whose parents aren’t working that benefit the most.”

Childcare workers have welcomed the funding boost but want more detail and the group representing privately-owned childcare providers, the Australian Childcare Alliance, wants immediate help for families.

“There is a long time between now and mid-2017 and families right across the country are telling us they need relief now,” ACA president Gwynn Bridge said in a statement.

The changes explained:

  • A new single means-tested Child Care Subsidy set to begin on July 1, 2017 to replace the Child Care Benefit, Child Care Rebate and Jobs, Education and Training Child Care Fee Assistance programs
  • Families earning up to $65,000 will receive 85 per cent of the childcare cost per child, or a designated benchmark price, whichever is lower. That will reduce to 50 per cent for families with incomes of $170,000 and above
  • Hourly benchmark prices will be $11.55 (long day care), $10.70 (family day care), $10.10 (out-of-school hours care) and $7.00 (in-home care nanny pilot program due to begin in January 2016)
  • There will be no cap on subsidies for families with an income below $185,000, while those who earn beyond that will receive an increased cap of $10,000 per child, up from $7,500
  • Subsidy is subject to new activity test for up to 100 hours of subsidised care per child, per fortnight, paid directly to providers
  • Up to 24 hours help will also be offered to families with incomes less than $65,000 who do not meet activity test requirements
  • The ‘no jab, no play’ policy remains with all childcare subsidies linked to immunisation requirements
  • Policy to cost $3.5 billion over four years, funded by cuts to Families Tax Benefit payments stuck in the Senate

 

 

 

This post originally appeared on ABC Online.

 

 

 

 

 

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Anon 9 years ago

In a country that is quickly becoming Job First Family Second, this is sad to see. My son goes to a daycare 2 days per week because my wife and I can't afford for her to stay at home. Some of those little babies come in at 6am and stay until closing time. Their mothers are working 12 hour shifts and rarely have both parents home together. Now this is going to give baby even less time at home bonding with mother before being tossed into a baby farm while mother earns and pays taxes.

Lisa Jensen 9 years ago

I thoroughly resent you're description of child-care as being a "baby farm". Early Childhood Educators are tertiary qualified professionals, and studies have proven a huge benefit for kids participating in these programs. Not to mention that, considering their qualifications and the work they do, they are pretty much THE most underpaid industry today - I promise you none of them are in it for the money, all of them are in it because they love kids and love having such a positive impact on others lives.

Anon 9 years ago

Please don't get me wrong Lisa. For the record I love the work that childcare workers do. They work a demanding, stressful job for very little pay. I support them 100%.
However I believe that society is pushing children away from their parents, by requiring both parents to work full time jobs. And now they want to kick mum away from baby and back to work even sooner! It's so wrong...

Lisa Jensen 9 years ago

Perhaps you see it as nit-picking, however I was just reacting to what I personally found to be an offensive description. It is offhand generalisations like referring to child care centres as baby farms or, as was done on The Project recently, equating educators to baby-sitters, that hugely contributes to the lack of recognition this profession gets, and part of the reason we are so terribly underpaid.

Lisa Jensen 9 years ago

Apologies if my short rant came across as aggressive - I just strongly feel that the term you used really undermined educators dedication, commitment and knowledge. It's incredibly frustrating to work so hard for your qualification, then even harder in your job, to see the profession consistently insulted with throwaway terms :-/


Anon 9 years ago

So employers will just stop offering paid parental leave then. Employment conditions are set to attract and retain employees. If the employer offering PPL is no longer going to benefit the employee (since it means they will loose the govt PPL) employers will just stop doing it. No point them paying PPL out of their own corporate pockets if the Govt will just pay it instead!!

Daijobou 9 years ago

Generally the employer would pay above the minimum wage - but i guess it depends on the job. I know I will be taking a very close look at my employment contract when I am thinking of having kids, and re-negotiating the maternity leave. I would rather get paid at my standard wage than take the governments package.