By ABC political correspondent Emma Griffiths
Most families will receive more help with childcare costs under the Abbott Government’s major budget initiative, but the boost will come at the expense of some new parents and families with one parent staying at home.
The Federal Government wants to encourage parents to do more paid work and has unveiled a plan aimed at making childcare more affordable.
Under the changes, families with household incomes up to $165,000 will be better off by $30 a week and even those earning more than $185,000 will receive more assistance.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott said the measures will lead to 240,000 families increasing their hours in paid employment, including almost 38,000 jobless families.
“We are changing the economics of going back to work so that we will get more work, so that families will have more opportunities to increase their income,” he said.
But the extra spending of $3.5 billion over four years is contingent on the Senate passing cuts in last year’s budget to Family Tax Benefits, including stopping payments entirely to single-income families when children turn six.
“Unless we offset this new spending it cannot go ahead,” Mr Abbott said.
Social Services Minister Scott Morrison said the proposals would have to “wash their own face fiscally”.
“We are not going to tax Peter, Paul and Mary to support new investment,” he said.
It sets the scene for more high-stakes negotiations with the crossbench in the Senate, with Labor ruling out any support for the cuts.
Top Comments
In a country that is quickly becoming Job First Family Second, this is sad to see. My son goes to a daycare 2 days per week because my wife and I can't afford for her to stay at home. Some of those little babies come in at 6am and stay until closing time. Their mothers are working 12 hour shifts and rarely have both parents home together. Now this is going to give baby even less time at home bonding with mother before being tossed into a baby farm while mother earns and pays taxes.
I thoroughly resent you're description of child-care as being a "baby farm". Early Childhood Educators are tertiary qualified professionals, and studies have proven a huge benefit for kids participating in these programs. Not to mention that, considering their qualifications and the work they do, they are pretty much THE most underpaid industry today - I promise you none of them are in it for the money, all of them are in it because they love kids and love having such a positive impact on others lives.
Please don't get me wrong Lisa. For the record I love the work that childcare workers do. They work a demanding, stressful job for very little pay. I support them 100%.
However I believe that society is pushing children away from their parents, by requiring both parents to work full time jobs. And now they want to kick mum away from baby and back to work even sooner! It's so wrong...
Perhaps you see it as nit-picking, however I was just reacting to what I personally found to be an offensive description. It is offhand generalisations like referring to child care centres as baby farms or, as was done on The Project recently, equating educators to baby-sitters, that hugely contributes to the lack of recognition this profession gets, and part of the reason we are so terribly underpaid.
Apologies if my short rant came across as aggressive - I just strongly feel that the term you used really undermined educators dedication, commitment and knowledge. It's incredibly frustrating to work so hard for your qualification, then even harder in your job, to see the profession consistently insulted with throwaway terms :-/
So employers will just stop offering paid parental leave then. Employment conditions are set to attract and retain employees. If the employer offering PPL is no longer going to benefit the employee (since it means they will loose the govt PPL) employers will just stop doing it. No point them paying PPL out of their own corporate pockets if the Govt will just pay it instead!!
Generally the employer would pay above the minimum wage - but i guess it depends on the job. I know I will be taking a very close look at my employment contract when I am thinking of having kids, and re-negotiating the maternity leave. I would rather get paid at my standard wage than take the governments package.