“The assassin is still out there.”
One year after the terrorist attack in Paris on the offices of Charlie Hedbo and subsequent related attacks the satirical magazine has revealed the cover of a special edition.
The satirical magazine lost 12 people when terrorists Saïd and Chérif Kouachi stormed the offices on January 7th 2015. Five more people died in related attacks in France in the following days on a kosher supermarket and at a warehouse.
A year on a striking magazine cover marks the occasion. The cover depicts a bearded God-like man with a Kalashnikov slung across his back. The image is black and white all except for splatters of bright red blood on the hem and the cuff of the man’s robes.
“One year after: The assassin is still out there,” the headline reads as the magazine names religion as the root of recent violence in France.
Laurent Sourisseau, the newspaper’s director who also goes by the name Riss, drew the cover and wrote an editorial describing the horror he survived, denouncing “fanatics” and defending secularism.
“A believer, especially a fanatic, never forgets the affront to his faith, because it is behind and ahead of him forever… It is eternity that fell on us this Wednesday, Jan. 7. These two masked idiots will not screw up the work of our lives.”
Top Comments
For everyone leaping down my throat about my comment below: I DO NOT ADVOCATE THE ATTACK.
My point is: if Islam has specific rules about depcitions of Muhammed, why can we not respect those? Why is there a need for Charlie Hedbo to be deliberately offensive in this way? Can they not make a parody of Islam without using an image of Muhammed? Human respect trumps free speech in my book, and human respect includes respecting others' religions, even if they're not my own and the rules don't apply specifically to me.
This is exactly how I feel as well. Squish, you've done everything possible to clarify that you don't support or excuse violent retributions. So the persistent comments claiming otherwise are becomng undeserved harassment. I don't think you owe them any more time or effort tbh You've been pretty tolerant.
I don't think you understand that to parody Islam in any shape or form, even without images of Mohammed, is considered blasphemy and offensive and would have been used as an excuse for murder. As for respecting religion, that is your choice to do so, but many people don't and it is their right to mock and deride it, just as they might any belief systems, such as fascism or communism. Religion should not get a free ride.
So respect for others' religious beliefs just goes out the window? What has the world come to....
Thanks a lot for that. It's nice to know some people still hold respect for other religions.
If the media, papers, Charlie Hebdo, whatever want to make fun of a religion, pigeonhole a faith, so be it. That is free speech.
As a Christian, I dont like them making fun of Christ and Christianity, but I get over it, because they're entitled to free speech as much as I'm entitled to be offended.
I'll admit to being conflicted. I agree with you. And my dis-belief/non-belief means my instinct to take the..ah..''mickey' is strong. But weighing it up, when so many innocent Christians and Muslims have explained that making 'fun' of their religion profoundly hurts them, my laughs become a lesser priority. I maintain the right but I guess conscience holds me back.
[sorry, don't mean to spam you lol but can't edit] Just realised how "conscience" sounds. It's more true to say, I'd feel bad]