Don’t freak out.
A new study about birthing methods is doing the rounds and of course it’s making people nervous.
The research, published in the British Medical Journal, suggests children born via C-section are more likely to suffer asthma, type-1 diabetes and obesity later in life.
And while this information is understandably concerning for a lot of women, it’s important to note there are a few things this new research hasn’t exactly explored.
Like, for example, how C-sections lead to chronic illnesses.
One theory behind the findings is that babies delivered by C-Section aren’t exposed to vaginal bacterias that can protect against disease. But still, the paper concludes by calling for more research.
Top Comments
A bad natural birth can have just as many long lasting health problems as a c-section.
My sister had an awful natural birth resulting in surgery under a general to repair the damage. Elective c-section for her next birth, recovery a walk in the park by comparison.
She is still traumatised from her natural birth 14 years later.
If Caesars were 'bad', doctors would not allow patients to have them.
The reality is and has always been Natural or Caesar are both safe for mother and child hence why both are allowed - Ask any medic and they will say the same.
There's nothing in the above article that said C sections are 'bad'.
Of course they are both safe, but if one's safer shouldn't people know that too?
Look, they're not bad, but they're not great either. Generally, they're pretty fine for babies, and obviously in cases they are life saving. But they aren't great for mothers, they really aren't. Adhesions and placenta accreta are very real things. And they are not good at all - the latter can be fatal.
What she said.
AGH adhesions!!! Welcome to my world.
People also forget that a c-section is major surgery - after which you're expected to care for a newborn baby, while also seriously sleep-deprived. Not ideal.