In my job, you get to meet a lot of babies.
As the Federal Minister for Families, last Friday I was with kids at the Shepherd Centre in Sydney talking about early intervention for kids with hearing problems, and the week before I was in Melbourne’s west speaking to mums returning to work after accessing Paid Parental Leave.
On Monday this week, I met the three Thornton kids from Grovedale, near Geelong. Bryce and Lainnie and their three kids are among the nine out of ten Australian families who will receive assistance under the Government’s plan to put a price on carbon pollution.
Meeting those babies and little kids is high on my list of great things about my job. They remind me why I do what I do. Every parent I’ve ever met is trying to do the right thing by their kids. We’re trying to do the right thing by our country.
Doing the right thing for your kids isn’t always easy. If sleepless nights weren’t enough, those babies grow up to start heated discussions about trips to the dentist or homework. And while there are many points in raising a family where it would be easier to give in, you try to do the right thing — in the hope that when they’re older, with a good education and strong teeth, they might just agree with you.
Taking action on climate change by putting a price on carbon isn’t easy — but we wouldn’t be doing the right thing by our kids if we gave in to all of the slurs and scare campaigns. We’re acting on climate change because we think it’s the right thing to do by our kids.
It’s effective because it will force the big polluters to pay a price for the pollution they put into our atmosphere — which until now they have done for free. This puts a dollar value on innovation, making it worthwhile to work out how to do what we do with less impact on the environment.
It’s fair because the polluters are paying for their pollution — and not Australian families.
Top Comments
I am all for trying to improve the environment. I want a better world for my children and their children. What I don't understand about this carbon tax is that it appears to be a circular re-distribution of wealth - tax the big polluters, who will pass on the costs to consumers, and then compensate lower income households. (NB: some households will be OVER compensated, apparently, what the?).
Over time, carbon credits available will decrease and therefore price per each credit will go up - putting increase pressure on consumers.
Why cant we look at a system that rewards, instead of penalises big polluters (and therefore consumers). Encourage with a carrot rather than hit with a stick companies to initiate innovation that will really make changes. They can communicate this to consumers and encourage people to switch to those companies that are making positive change for the better.
Obviously I haven't worked out all the details, but I hope you get my point ; ) It just feels like this carbon tax hasn't been worked out yet in detail and yes, it is scary that everything sounds like it will cost more.
Just received my increase in power costs letter from AGL for electricity and gas and despite us being diligent and lowering consumption year on year, we will continue to pay more despite our good intentions.
I can't see how a tax on Carbon Dioxide will affect the climate in the least. Even on the government's own figures! If you're really serious about climate change, then incentives for the invention, development and implementation of renewable energy schemes would be the way to go, not a massive income re-distribution scheme that will only improve the lifestyle of bureaucrats and open the way for further rorts!