Warning: This post deals with strong themes and may be upsetting for some readers.
When a prisoner is sentenced to death in the US, prisons are legally compelled to execute them “humanely”.
But what happened when the State Corrections Department of Oklahoma administered a new, untested drug cocktail to a death row inmate this week has been described as far from humane.
Clayton Lockett, 38, was alive for 43 minutes and “writhing on the gurney” when his vein exploded after the administration of a triple injection. The death row inmate was declared unconscious 10 minutes after being injected with the sedative midazolam — the first of a three-drug combination — but began breathing heavily three minutes later, The Australian reports.
The Oklahoman described the ensuing, horrifying scene like this:
“Lockett grimaced and tensed his body several times over a three-minute period before the execution was shielded from the press. After being declared unconscious 10 minutes into the process, Lockett spoke at three separate moments. The first two were inaudible, however, the third time he spoke, Lockett said the word ‘man.'”
Officials attempted to halt the procedure and after about 16 minutes had passed, they drew the blinds on the viewing chamber through which observers were watching.
Lockett eventually suffered a fatal heart attack at 7:06pm — almost three-quarters of an hour after the administration of the first injection — according to a statement from prisons spokesman Jerry Massie.
The execution of another death row inmate, Charles Warner, was stayed for 14 days following the horrifying incident.
The prison was set to use the same experimental mix of drugs on Warner as it had on Lockett.
Warner’s lawyer Madeline Cohen, who has previously argued that the new drug combination would make it “impossible to know whether the executions will comport with the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual suffering”, criticised the state’s role in the incident.
Top Comments
He abducted viciously raped/sodomised, shot a 17 year old girl who was then buried alive....I hope his pain was endless!
Disgust over one criminals crimes (and yes, they horrify me too) does not condone the action itself, the wider ramifications of allowing a tortuous death and the death penalty itself far out way it. Yes, if it was my daughter I would want him to feel endless pain but then I would not be an appropriate person to dictate what happens as I would not be impartial.
One thing I find interesting in the pro and anti death penality argument is the idea that life imprisonment is more humane than the death penality, putting someone away for life does not seem any more humane to me than the death penality (assuming it's not botched like this case), of course if the prisoner turns out to be wrongly committed a life sentence is obviously not permanent like death! However I have always thought it far worse to be locked away for the rest of ones life-30,40,50 years then be put to death.
I'm not saying I am pro death penalty (I actually see both points of view pro and anti) but I just find it interesting that people who are anti death penalty seem to see life imprisonment as the "humane" alternative.
I understand the anti death penalty arguments that people may be innocent (a terrifying thought!) or that even if guilty we shouldn't stoop to their level, however if we know for sure that someone is guilty of a heinous crime then whilst I wouldn't wish ill on them I don't think any of us should feel that we have to extend our compassion to this person or are energies in trying to help them, I would rather spend the limited time I have helping nice humans. I agree that we should execute humanely but I don't think it makes anyone a bad person if they don't feel compassion for someone who has committed such terrible crimes.
Also even if you do feel compassion for these people (and sometimes I do when I hear they had a terrible childhood) I do feel that some people are do irreparable damaged that they need to be removed from society, it's not just a matter of being safe from them, but it is very creepy thinking that these people are still breathing the same air as the rest of us, no doubt having sexual fantasies reminiscing about the horrible way they killed someone, and the victims family know that these people will be probably doing that, and that must be awful for a parent to think some man is gloating and fantasising about how he killed their daughter, at least if he is dead they can't do that. Also jail staff have to deal with these people every day, even if they are cautious they still have to be faced with this evil in their jobs.
So I really do think it would be better for these murderers to be removed from life, even though I do feel compassion for some of them who have become so horribly damaged through childhood abuse etc.
However the one reason I would not support the death penalty being reintroduced is due to the fact that innocent people do get executed.
I am anti death penalty and one of my main reasons are as you stated, so often they get it wrong, in which case in my mind it makes it an entirely moot option. Do I think that life in prison is humane? No, I think it is exceptionally hard which is why it is reserved for the most severe crimes. I do not always feel compassion for someone who has committed an atrocity against another human being however I think it is important that we retain our humanity when dealing with anyone, to kill someone inhumanely (even someone whom has committed an atrocity) impacts on us and reduces us and the civilisation we live in. To not uphold and strive for high standards in humanity can create a slippery slope. In an ideal world we could strive to ensure that people do not end up in situations where they commit atrocities and face life in prison (an impossibility in my book) but I have an empathy for what can bring some of these people to such devastating actions.