It’s hard to imagine a family member stooping so low. Or, is it?
UPDATE:
Today was the day that a major American magazine made the calculated decision to cause controversy, pain and suffering surrounding Bobbi Kristina‘s death.
Today was the day that the 29,400 people that Like The National Enquirer‘s Facebook page woke up to a photo of Bobbi Kristina Brown in her hospice bed, spliced with an image of her mother, Whitney Houston, in her coffin.
The National Enquirer, possibly the world’s most notorious tabloid magazine, paid a rumoured US$100,000 for the photo, which they then published on their front cover, along with a headline that says “World Exclusive – the last photo!”. A tagline next to the photos says “More chilling images inside”.
Reportedly, there are two ‘death’ photos of Bobbi that have been sold to publications – one taken at the wake, one taken when she lay in her hospice bed.
It’s a disgusting attempt at profiting off the death of a celebrity. It’s time to let her rest in peace.
Mamamia previously wrote…
Did the poor kid ever have a chance?
Considering the appalling circus that was the funeral of 22-year-old Bobbi Kristina Brown last week, the answer seems a resounding no.
Because today it emerged that someone at that funeral took a photograph of Whitney Houston and Bobby Brown’s tragic daughter, who was found unconscious in a bathtub six months ago, dead in her coffin. What’s more, they sold the sick picture for an estimated US$100,000.
Top Comments
I have no problem with it. She wasn't a celebrity anyway.
I don't see any issue with taking a photo of the deceased. It's only the publication without consent or sale of that photo which I feel is unethical.
really? so how do you get consent from a dead person?
Consent? Why would I need the consent of a dead person to take their photo? The deceased cannot provide consent to an open casket funeral either, and has no say in who attends their funeral or how they are eulogised unless they have made it clear in their Will.
Who provides consent for the media photos of dead bodies in war zones?
I'd say it's more a question of ethics than consent. And the ethics of taking a photo of a nicely presented cadaver (if it was open casket I'd say they'd have made her look pretty) would depend on cultural attitudes to death and dead bodies.
Personally, I see nothing inherently wrong with taking a photo as a personal memento.
I know of people who have photos of their deceased, it was at times in the past very common for that to be done however it was as a remembrance not as a money making opportunity. That is what makes this distasteful.
I have no problem with viewing such a photo if someone wishes and consents for me to do so, even if it was a celebrity, even if it was in a magazine, as long as it's their next of kin's choice to allow it as I would assume they have a good reason for that. Some people don't wish to view the deceased by choice or because of cultural reasons, which putting on Facebook or a magazine cover is insensitive of. However this isn't done with the family's consent and is only being done to make money both for the seller and for any publication or media that show it.
Why would anyone want to look at a photo of a deceased person? I know people in times past would take a photo of someone posed as if alive, because it could have been the only photo they had. But these days? Why?