Sigh. A study of parenting styles tell us what we’ve secretly known all along…
Whether you are a strict, overbearing, “second-place-is-the-first-loser” parent or an “I-love-you-no-matter-what, trying-is-better-than-winning” parent, you’re doing it right. Backed by science.
In news that will infuriate “Tiger Mom”, there’s no direct advantage to ensuring that your child is number one in absolutely everything.
In case you have forgotten about “Tiger Mom”, here is a 10-second explanation. Also known as Amy Chua, the Yale Law school graduate penned a couple of books telling “trying-is-better-than-winning” parents that they are the reason society is collapsing. Amy is a big believer in the “second-place-is-the-first-loser” parenting style. Ultimate success is fun. Anything else is terrible.
Well, the results are in.
Stanford conducted a new study pitting different parenting techniques against each other.
And they found:
Neither are superior. So right now "second-place-is-the-first-loser" parents are fuming and "trying-is-better-than-winning" parents are grinning - they have never come so close to first place.
According to the study, it is just a matter of where the child's motivation is placed.