My 6-year-old just summed up the entire election with one question.
I took her along with me this morning to witness Australian politics in action (And possibly to enjoy the post-vote democracy sausage). And there we were in the primary school yard when I felt inspired to turn it into a learning experience.
Top Comments
It was pretty equal in my area. I wouldn't expect a candidate to run for gender balance reasons - nor would I vote for someone not representing my views because we had gender in common. That kind of thinking is very simplistic and reductive. I think it's appropriate to teach children to see beyond stereotypical gender characteristics. Imagine if she asked why there were no white people to vote for in an ethic area?
My doctor is a women, but that isn't the reason why she's my doctor. Just as my obstetrician is a man, because he's the best one and I like him, nothing to do with what's between his legs. It's what's in his head and heart that count for us.
This is so sad it's pathetic.
A vagina/penis doesn't represent you. you are voting for the person with the best policies for you, your family and your belief in what this country should stand for.
I voted Pauline Hanson. I felt her policies were what represented me. My decision was not influenced by her having a vagina. Nor do I vote based on someone owning a penis.
Agreed. Though I don't agree with your political voting choice, and guess what. I'm fine with that, since it is based on my views compared to your views.
What I do disagree with is the assertion that as a woman you now need to vote based on the candidates possession of a vagina which seems so popular on this site.
I'm with you Jeremy. Pauline is a strong woman who isn't afraid to stand up for her beliefs and takes all the knockers in her stride.
Go Pauline.
I think ultimately most people vote for the candidate best representing their personal values and concerns. But I am fecking tired of middle-aged and old white men dominating politics and positions of power. At least the voters are now tossing out candidates for unacceptable behaviour I.e Jamie Briggs - what a nerve running after his pathetic carry on in HK, and can't believe Libs would have him run after all that and risk losing such a safe seat, goes to show its more about loyalty to the ranks than the party or the people, put a fresh face in there. Same with Abbott - why did he run? Now talks of another leadership
spill FFS!!