By Janine Cohen
Melbourne doctor Rodney Syme could lose his medical licence and face criminal charges if he defies regulatory authorities and proceeds to help a 70-year-old man end his life.
Dr Syme promised to give Bernard Erica, who has terminal cancer, the lethal and illegal drug Nembutal for him to take at a time of his own choosing.
The Medical Board of Australia held an urgent hearing last month and found that Dr Syme posed a serious risk to Mr Erica and ruled the doctor was not to give any end-of-life advice or care to people.
The 80-year-old euthanasia advocate told Australian Story his options were to abide by the Medical Board, or help Mr Erica and face the consequences.
Dr Syme promised months ago to give Nembutal to Mr Erica, who has tongue and lung cancer.
The Medical Board found there were also serious risks when Dr Syme was not consulting with the rest of Mr Erica’s team of treating practitioners.
It warned Dr Syme that “any action that results in the intentional death of a person may be a criminal offence”.
In Victoria, assisting another person to suicide carries a five-year prison sentence.
“I will not desert Bernard, I will continue to support him in every way that I can. Just how that pans out remains to be seen,” Dr Syme said.
“At this stage, I haven’t decided what I will do, but it’ll be a huge battle with my conscience to do anything other than what I have been doing.
“I believed that providing him with my support and advice, and in particular, medication, would be the best palliative care that I could provide.”
Top Comments
In Janine Cohen’s post on Mamamia today (7/3/16) re Australian Story tonight she reports that Dr Karen Hitchcock, a physician at the Alfred Hospital posed the question “Is Rodney Syme the one who decides now when people’s life is not worth living”? I would pose an alternative question. “Is Karen Hitchcock the one who decides now when people’s life is worth living”? The answer to both questions is no. Neither Dr Syme nor Dr Hitchcock is the person who decides about the person’s life; it is the private decision of the person and nobody else.
Dr Hitchcock indicates that “Physical pain at the end of life is treatable – we have powerful drugs available to us”. She has missed the point by emphasising the drug armamentarium of the doctor, not the intent of the person . Considerable overseas experience indicates that it is loss of dignity and concern of inability to care for one’s self that are the main concerns of people approaching the end of their lives. Not pain relief. Not relief with Dr Hitchcock’s “powerful drugs”. Shamefully in Australia, people who have reached the conclusion that continuing their life is unbearable, do not have a compassionate mechanism whereby their conclusion can be mandated. Fortunate indeed are those few who have access to caring physicians like Dr Syme.
I know it is a Netlix drama, but Claire assisted her mother with dying in the most lovely, dignified way.
How can people not have that choice?