1. Brisbane mother murdered
Police in Brisbane have released an image of a person of interest in connection with the murder of mother-of-three Anthea Mari in the early hours of Tuesday morning.
Detectives are hoping to speak to Jacob Michael Smith, who is from the Gold Coast.
Smith was described as 180cm tall, of average build with dark-brown hair.
Police said that Anthea Mari lived in the house with her two daughters, aged 11 and 12, as well as two male housemates.
Her eldest daughter lived with her grandmother.
The Daily Mail reports the 34-year-old mother of three girls was a victim of domestic violence. She had revealed in a newsletter to a Catholic community group that she had “spent 15 years “in and out of domestic violence refuges, couch-surfing… and even sleeping in her car while raising her three children.”
“Don’t think you’re the only one. There are plenty of other women going through it, too,” she wrote.
The Courier Mail reports her Facebook page contains a heartbreaking post on the topic of domestic violence, saying: “If she flinches when you go to put your arm around her … Someone else’s hand once wasn’t so sweet.
Anyone with information is asked to call CrimeStoppers on 1800 333 000.
2. Permanent cease-fire for Gaza
After weeks of talks in Cairo there are hopes this morning that a permanent ceasefire agreement has been reached in Gaza.
Top Comments
I fear getting slammed, but the UK judge is correct. Rape, in ALL circumstances is wrong and abhorrent. However, if a woman(or man as the case may be) is too drunk to say no it beings into play the ' mistaken belief of consent' where a man honestly but mistakenly believes the woman is consenting to sex. It gets difficult to make a ruling if both parties are so intoxicated that they cannot remember the details of the event.
Don't misunderstand, I am not saying rape is ever ok, I am not blaming women who get raped when they are drunk, and I am not saying women should not drink. I simply agree with the judge that in court cases, alcohol adds another level difficulty in securing a conviction.
I definitely hear what the judge is saying (and I have had my own attacker be acquitted, even though I was stone cold sober).
She's not justifying the rapists behaviour. She's just pointing out the difficult position the jury is in, when they have to find that X happened, beyond reasonable doubt....when even the victim doesn't know exactly what happened, because she was so drunk. Very tough situation for jurors, and certainly harder to convict in that instance.
Meanwhile, number 8 made me tear up. So nice to see some kind things in the nees!
I agree. I fear getting slammed for 'blaming the victim.' But she is right. If you're so drunk that you couldn't give consent or otherwise, how do you know that you didn't lead the rapist to believe it was OK. And if the rapist is drunk too, how do his thought processes work out consent or otherwise? Rape is evil, but we also have to have control of our own lives and try not to put ourselves in harms way.
Eek I have to disagree with you - although I am certainly not trying to slam you!
I do get what you are saying, but really, if a girl is that drunk, no one should be having sex with her. I think that's the point that needs to be reiterated to young men.
Sure, if you're a couple and you're out getting smashed, of course you're probably going to be having drunken (implicitly consensual) sex. In Vic, there is a defence that covers that - that the perpetrator "honestly believed the victim was consenting".
But if you meet a girl at a bar and she is blind drunk, it should be in a guys mind to assess whether the girl is within her own senses enough to consent. If you think you'll lose the chance to sleep with her once she sobers up, then maybe that says something about whether you should have sex with her.
If they are both so drunk how do you know who raped who?