Virginia’s vagina intrusion bill passes
The US state of Virignia has passed a bill which would require women to have a ‘transvaginal ultrasound’ if they wish to have an abortion. That’s it. No debate, no correspondence entered into. Website Daily Kos reported:
“The ultrasound legislation would constitute an unprecedented government mandate to insert vaginal ultrasonic probes into women as part of a state-ordered effort to dissuade them from terminating pregnancies, legislative opponents noted.
“We’re talking about inside a woman’s body,” Del. Charnielle Herring, a Democrat, said in an emotional floor speech. “This is the first time, if we pass this bill, that we will be dictating a medical procedure to a physician.”
The conservative Family Foundation hailed the ultrasound measure as an “update” to the state’s existing informed consent laws “with the most advanced medical technology available.”
The procedure is designed to guilt women into keeping their baby and serves no medical function.
Biggest Loser trainer Tiffiny Hall says she has ‘fat days’
The taekwondo and Biggest Loser trainer with a penchant for being tough as nails said during an interview even she had her off days. ”I don’t care what weight you are, I have days where I feel fat. I work on camera in white Lycra. I know I eat healthy but sometimes it’s just irrational. I’m not a model. I don’t look like a TV presenter – I’ve got muscles and a different sort of body type. We’ve all had the voice in your head that says, ‘You’re no good. You’re going to fail.’ Every woman knows what that feels like.” Hall’s father was an Olympic taekwondo trainer and she says she was used to going for early morning runs with him. “We’d get home and the juicer was always buzzing. It was built into our lives, so it was odd to join The Biggest Loser and meet people who thought that wasn’t normal.”
Top Comments
I haven't got past the first headline. Forcibly inserting something into someone's vagina without their consent is RAPE. Incredible.
Agreed.
I agree with your statement 100%. I think having an abortion would be distressing enough anyway without having to have something inserted into your vagina.
I have always wondered though and have not wanted to ask my sisters who have been through it, why do they perform an ultrasound at all?
I was horrified when my sister told me she had to have an ultra sound prior to her abortion...
Anyway to bring in this legislation is to me just adding another level of trauma for women at a time that is already bad enough.
Apparently it is to confirm how far along the pregnancy is (there are risks of an incomplete termination if it is too early) and is also used to precisely locate area of the uterus the pregnancy is situated.
It's so they know how far along you are, and to check for any complications - eg ectopic pregnancy.
Regarding this transvaginal ultrasound business, I'm a little confused. I don't want to start a fight with anyone but as a woman who suffers from PCOS I have to have these regularly and they're not as bad as a pap smear.
I don't understand why, if these are not medically necessary, they think this would have any impact at all on whether or not a woman will have an abortion?
Surely the abortion itself is far more invasive than this procedure, which is painless and frankly not much worse than inserting a tampon? Not much more invasive than inserting a tampon either. Well, except for the whole 'someone else is doing it' bit.
Is it the thinking behind this that is the issue? Is it because they want to show the woman the baby? Do you have to get a normal ultrasound prior to an abortion currently?
Could someone please explain this in further detail? I really don't understand.
Your penultimate paragraph is the key issue here, MissT. It's not necessarily the *procedure* that's the problem, it's the *intent*. Basically, these.... so-and-so's hope that by forcing a woman to see her foetus on ultrasound, to see a heartbeat and count fingers and toes, that she will change her mind about having an abortion. They're projecting external guilt, fear and judgement over what should be a very private decision.
I don't have a uterus but to me the offensive part of this is pretty obvious: the Republicans are shaming women into (maybe) keeping their babies if they make them look at them on an ultrasound. It's not the procedure itself, it's the fact it serves absolutely not medical function whatsoever apart from backing an ideology. And the bitter pill that goes with that is they're forcing doctors to perform these procedures as well. For a party that so values individual liberties, that's a massive departure...
[I went into a meeting for 45 minutes in the middle of writing this and saw DetachP's comment but I'd written it so I pressed submit anyway!]
Thanks. I understand now.
I've had one of those ultrasounds, and it was no different to a regular one. I had it because I didn't have enough water in my bladder to be able to see anything, so they had to go inside. I agree it's not a big deal physically. And you do have to have an ultrasound before an abortion here (I did, I don't think that's changed). As you probably know, it's not an any clearer ultrasound or anything. I had one with KDot where they just did the normal on the skin one and then did the internal one, but I can't remember why.
You wouldn't need an internal ultrasound to see all the bits of the baby - the sonographer showed me all the bits on the screen at my 20 week scan - the one I had when preggo was at about 34 weeks to check for placenta praevia.