Acupuncture has become a frequently used treatment prior to and during in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Women hope it will increase their chances of having a baby, but also provide support with reducing stress, and feeling relaxed and well while undergoing treatment.
Several small clinical trials have previously suggested acupuncture improved outcomes of stressful and unpredictable fertility treatments. But our new study has found this is not the case.
The study of more than 800 Australian and New Zealand women undergoing acupuncture treatment during their IVF cycles has failed to confirm significant difference in live birth rates.
The findings published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) support recent guidelines from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and two high-quality meta-analyses (which combine data from multiple studies to identify a common effect).
What the study found.
We examined the effects of a short course of acupuncture administered during an IVF cycle. We were not able to show that acupuncture increased live births, clinical pregnancy or having fewer miscarriages.
Undertaken across 16 IVF centres in Australia and New Zealand, the randomised controlled clinical trial (that compares the effects of an experimental treatment on one group with those of a placebo or alternative treatment in another group) aimed to increase live births and pregnancies among 848 women aged 18 to 42, undergoing an IVF cycle using fresh embryos, over a four year period.
The first acupuncture treatment was given at the start of the IVF process when medication is given to stimulate the ovary to produce follicles.
Top Comments
Congratulations on writing an article about a scientific study presenting the results as fact instead of what they actually are, results from one scientific study. As the author knows, it’s still early days, there are many variables. Personally my acupuncturist advised that after I commenced acupuncture for fertility with her that We wait for three cycles of acupuncture treatment until I begin IVF, to prepare my body and help improve my chances of success with IVF. This is a practitioner with 15+ years fertility experience and she made no promises. After my first embryo transfer I fell pregnant and I’m currently 16 weeks along. I know I’m lucky, but I also believe my hormones and menstral cycle was significantly improved by those 3 months preparation. You are presenting one study that doesn’t include the critical “before IVF” treatment (as you mentioned) I believe your article will place doubt in the minds of women unnecessarily when you don’t actually have all the answers. These are couples who want to get pregnant and you actually don’t know for 100% sure that acupuncture doesn’t make a significant difference to their chances of success. You only know if they have acupuncture starting from day 1 of stimulated cycle, didn’t make a difference. Try and be more scientific when you present your findings... peoples hopes and dreams are riding on this
This seems pretty scientific to me.
I can't believe you just told actual scientists to "be more scientific". Hilarious.
Your anecdotal evidence is far less scientific than this article.
As a scientist I know how to present findings of research. The number one rule is to not present results as facts. It’s one study that does not incorporate a comprehensive acupuncture approach typically utilised by a practitioner. The article says acupuncture doesn’t change the outcome of ivf. This has not actually been proven by this study. What’s been shown is under the conditions the study employed, there was no noticeable difference in live birth outcomes. That’s my point.
Some more anecdotal evidence: I got pregnant after the first embryo transfer and had no acupuncture.