This news report out of the UK has shocked and saddened many, and sparked outrage among pro-life groups.
An investigation in the UK has revealed that more than 15,000 aborted foetuses or miscarried babies were incinerated – and their remains used to heat UK hospitals – over the past two years.
That’s a shocking statement to read, and likely even those among us who are staunchly pro-choice will have some sort of emotional response to it.
The aborted foetuses and miscarried babies were incinerated as ‘clinical waste’ (which is not an uncommon practice here in Australia), but the element of the story that has generated so much controversy is that the bodies were used in ‘waste-to-energy programs’ that generated energy to heat hospitals.
An investigation by the UK’s Channel 4 Dispatches found that two hospitals admitted to using this ‘clinical waste’ to generate heat; while 10 other hospitals burned the remains with other general rubbish from the hospital.
The reporter who undertook the investigation, Britain’s Got Talent judge Amanda Holden, told the UK’s Mirror, “It’s disgraceful to think babies were thrown into the burner alongside waste such as bandages and syringes.”
Health Minister Dr Dan Poulter called the practice “totally unacceptable”, and called for an immediate ban.
Top Comments
I fail to see why anyone who has had a termination would care. It just seems ridiculous to me.
As for a miscarriage, that would depend on their definition of miscarriage v stillborn wouldn't it?
What happens to first trimester miscarriages in Australia? I'm sure they are disposed of in the same way as other clinical waste.
This doesn't actually bother me. I think that parents should be offered another option but if they choose hospital cremation with no remains returned, why is this not acceptable?