An 80-year-old man has been ordered to stand trial for raping his wife in the 1960s. The interesting thing here is that the man’s actions weren’t illegal at the time – common law principles back then meant marriage amounted to consent. His lawyer has argued that present-day values are irrelevant in the case. “One cannot apply contemporary values to apply what the law was. That would be a total oxymoron.,” he said. What do you think?
2. Australian women will join the fight on the frontline
Women in the Australian Defence Force will be able to serve on the frontline within the next five years. Minister for Defence Stephen Smith said cabinet had approved the measures that will allow women to join frontline units in combat. Currently only 93 per cent of Defence Force positions are open to women and the other seven per cent of positions – which make up 17 per cent of employment and include roles such as mine disposal divers and air force defence guards – exclude women “on the basis of sex”. The move will end the Defence Force’s exemption from Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act.
Top Comments
If he can not be convicted as a rapist so be it,but at least everyone will know he is.And I hope every male that ever got away with this ultimate act of violence against womanhood would also know that they too are labeled a rapist by the universe whether or not they are ever convicted
Heres some good news to brighten your day.
Andrew Bolt has just been found guilty of race discrimination.
Oh, yes ! A great day indeed.
I'll always remember today's date as the day that the right to ask a question was taken away.
So in future, when you ask a question.....it had bloody well better be the right question. The one that Big Brother is prepared to answer.
This is only the beginning. Today it was Andrew Bolt on the chopping block. To those laughing....will you be laughing as loud when it's your turn to be questioned ?
One of my great grandmothers was Irish, the other Russian. I wonder how I'd be seen if I popped over to Moscow and demanded to be treated as a Russian citizen ?
Your argument here is very flawed.
I'm not arguing, Sarah. I'm stating my opinion, and I respect your right to state yours. However....if I was offended by your opinion and could prove that someone else was offended on my behalf, then I could take you to court for airing that opinion.
Tip of the iceberg, and all that !
Too true, Bradley :(