By Matt Brown, Caitlyn Gribbin
The leader of the child recovery team allegedly involved in an operation which led to the arrest of an Australian mother and television crew in Lebanon told the ABC in the lead-up to the botched attempt that he tried to “avoid dangerous situations”.
Foreign Minister Julie Bishop says Lebanese authorities are treating the arrest of Brisbane woman Sally Faulkner and a Channel Nine television crew “very seriously”.
Ms Faulkner and the 60 Minutes team have been questioned by a Lebanese judge, who could downgrade child abduction charges against them.
The Channel Nine crew — presenter Tara Brown, producer Stephen Rice, cameraman Ben Williamson and sound recordist David Ballment — were among a group of people arrested after the attempt to take Ms Faulkner’s children off the streets of the capital, Beirut.
Child recovery team leader Adam Whittington, spoke to the ABC from a boat in Lebanese waters shortly before the mission took place, discussing the methods used by his company and alluding to a "big story" being filmed by 60 Minutes.
"We try and avoid dangerous situations. Obviously sometimes we can't. But our main priority is the safety of the children when we do jobs," he said.
"We work with authorities in many countries to get these jobs done."
"60 Minutes [are] with us now actually, doing a big story. So you should see that shortly."
The ABC understands Mr Whittington was taken off the boat by police when it returned to the marina.
Three of his agents are among those detained by police.
Bishop in 'constant communication' with Lebanese counterpart
Speaking on Wednesday, Ms Bishop said the group had not been formally charged, but charges were being recommended by Lebanese authorities.
"It underscores that we must abide by the laws of the country in which we are visiting, just as it would apply in Australia," she said.
"If people are in this country, they must abide by the laws of this country. But at this stage I don't want to go into any detail, I think it would be counter-productive."
It is understood the charges being brought by the prosecution include: hiding information, forming an association with two or more people to commit crime against a person, kidnapping or holding a minor, and physical assault.
Ms Bishop said she was in "constant communication" with her Lebanese counterpart, Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil.
"I understand that the Lebanese authorities are treating this matter very seriously, hence the recommendation that charges be laid, but I stress that no formal charges have been laid and that a judge has been appointed to investigate the matter.
"We are providing consular support and undertaking consular visits to all Australians detained as a result of this incident."
Ms Bishop said it was unclear how long the Australians would be detained in Lebanon.
"Lebanese law is different from Australian law, it's based on the French system, so there is this investigative stage. We don't have a direct equivalent in Australian law," she explained.
"We are taking advice but I understand that all of the Australians detained have retained lawyers, local lawyers, who will be advising them of their rights."
This post originally appeared on ABC News.
© 2016 Australian Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved. Read the ABC Disclaimer here.
Top Comments
'Ms Bishop said she was in "constant communication" with her Lebanese counterpart, Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil.'
And how much communication is Bishop in with the UK re Julian Assange?
The self imposed confinement of an alleged sex abuser is not really the same now is it.
Interesting that you would refer to Assange as an alleged sex abuser when at least one of the alleged 'victims' "felt manipulated by the police"
https://justice4assange.com...
The sex was consensual. The non-use of a condom the second time around was the question the 'victims' were seeking recourse for and NOT PURSUING any charges of any kind.
So the only thing you got right is that there is a huge difference between the two cases but you failed to identify the correct martyr.
http://www.crikey.com.au/20...
Bishop
"I'm not aware of any law that Julian Assange has broken in Australia," she told Sky News.
http://www.news.com.au/nati...
So, again, I ask how much communication is Bishop in with the UK re Julian Assange?
No prizes for who gets home to Australia first.
Haha.... justice 4assange.com....a completely unbiased source of information no doubt!
Yes Bishop is not aware of any law assange has broken IN Australia, he wasn't IN Australia at the time of offending now was he
He has not been arrested so he is not entitled to any assistance.... Perhaps if he made his way to the Australian embassy they might assist him in getting home, but he's not about to do that. The dopey sex criminal (alleged) will spend more time in self imposed prison than he would in jail......and yet he still thinks he's clever, he's just another arrogant fool on the road to nowhere!
You need to get off that horse. Its a dog.
Julian Assange exposed WAR CRIME and still no-one has been held accountable and yet you think you hold the moral high ground?
If Assange hasn't been arrested what are his bail conditions attached to? http://www.bbc.com/news/wor...
And although you got this detail wrong you slanderously refer to him as a "dopey sex criminal, parenthesis alleged."
If it's all the same to you, I won't be taking advice from someone who postulates rather than investigates because while the source is important the truth will be found in the CONTENT.