By MARK GREENE
We have all heard it said, over and over, that many men do not share their feelings. That these men can be good friends, husbands and lovers but that they remain, on some level, hidden.
That they do not communicate feelings well. The tendency to remain emotionally guarded is a matter of practical survival that men learn early in life.
They are taught that revealing their feelings is not safe. It is dangerous. It will cost them. It is result of a culture of male emotional withdrawal reinforced by generations of male traditions which value toughness and stoicism over communication and emotional connection.
While millions of men are choosing to try to move beyond these archaic ideas of what it is to be a man, millions more continue to endorse outmoded and emotionally limiting ideas of what it means to be a father, a lover, or a husband.
Leaving many men trapped in gender roles that are often brutally enforced by other men, women and sometimes, their own families. But whether one is attempting to move past old ideas or not, all of us continue to be haunted by fears born out of generations old ideas of manhood.
One result of this ongoing emotional suppression of men, is that our public dialogues (that of both men and women) are increasingly angry and binary, indicating that although both sexes are still invested on some level in our culture’s more archaic gender roles, no one’s all that happy with them anymore.
Top Comments
Can we have more posts like this? I am not currently in a relationship but I would love to know how I can be a better daughter to my dad and sister to my brother in relation to the issues men struggle with. There is so much I realise I don't understand about men and how they really think because many in my life are closed books! :)
Learn to communicate with a man, as a man.
Stop trying to get them to "open up and talk about their fears and emotions", which usually means (or is interpreted as) "sit down and blub like a woman." (N.B.: I am not criticising women, or their communication methods. Just trying to explain how it looks to a lot of blokes).
Unless a bloke can already "talk the talk", he's going to be attempting an new task (communicating in a way he's not familiar with), on a subject he doesn't particularly want to broach.
Look at how your man (hubby, dad, brother, son, whatever) communicates with his mates. Lots of swearing? Crude jokes? General blokiness? When he's working on something? Over a beer? Watching the telly?
Work on your technique (Daddy's little girl suddenly swearing like a trooper, burping and farting, then abruptly asking how he feels about his age won't work :wink:), and try to communicate with him in his own language (even if that is grunting and swearing). At least then he's only got one thing to concentrate on, and is less likely to become overwhelmed by everything adding up.
That said, don't assume that an apparent reluctance to talk, or an abrupt "I'm fine" means he's "closing off his emotions." He could actually be fine.
My late grandfather never said much, and communicated mainly through non-verbal means. You could tell he was happy/proud of you by the strength of his handshake (varied from strong to bonecrushing; with the rare double hander for special occasions) and the look in his eye that accompanied it. I was the first to find out he'd been given 3 months to live, and the conversation (it was the first thing that struck me when he greeted me) ran: Handshake. :idea:. "How long?" "Doc said 3 months." That was it.
I would be a little careful about applying this too generally. I think this is a good explanation of how boys learn to be guarded, given the feral nature of schoolyards and in some cases, familial conditioning, though I do see changes in my son's 20 something group who are more emotionally expressive.
I think being more reserved in later life, where one is less a prisoner of social expectations, can be a rational choice suited to some personalities. I have no problem explaining or describing my emotional state and feelings to someone who is genuinely interested and capable of really listening to what i am saying but common impediments are:
1. Asking about your feelings is really the opening step to talking about their's;
2. Listener impatience. I like to 'think to speak', while a lot of contemporary discussion of personal issues is dominated by the 'speak to thinks', which is a perfectly valid way to develop ideas but not for me. Hence I take some time to accurately explain my feelings and this is sometimes mistaken for reluctance to do so. This is especially difficult with somone impatient to burst into narratives.
3. What you think is in some way confronting to someone close to you. Sometimes 'tell me what you think/feel' is really 'tell me what you think/feel that supports my view of the world'.
4. And a particularly irritating variation of the above is distorting reinterpretations of what you say. 'So you really mean ...'
5. Paying lip service to emotional sharing but actually being quite impatient with you doing so. They are really thinking 'just harden up'.