By Robert Virtue.
While giving birth in a hospital remains the most popular option for mothers in New South Wales, a few hundred women choose to give birth in their homes each year.
Anne Turner is the mother of three children, one of whom was born at home, and is a committee member of the Hunter Positive Birth Support Group based in the Newcastle area.
The group aims to offer peer support, information, and an opportunity for pregnant women and mothers to share their experiences.
“We want women to feel allowed to enjoy that [birthing] experience, and to find ways that they’re going to be able to enjoy that experience, rather than being frightened of it or having it over-medicalised,” Ms Turner said.
“A lot of women feel that it’s a normal life event, and where they live is where they want to birth.
“It’s a very big difference for women who’ve birthed in hospital and home.
“[They] will talk about how different it feels to just be in your own space; you feel often a greater sense of control, more relaxed, safer.”
Homebirthing regulated to ensure safety
In the Hunter Valley, Hunter New England Health (HNEH) operates the Belmont Midwifery Group Practice (BMGP), which in turn runs a publicly-funded homebirth program.
It is open to women who have no identified birthing risks and are booked into the BMGP.
The group said it followed strict guidelines and was in constant contact with obstetricians.
In NSW in 2014 there were 228 planned homebirths and 30 homebirths that ended in hospital admissions.
In the HNEH district in 2014, there were 72 planned homebirths and nine homebirths that resulted in hospital admissions.
Top Comments
Even though home birth was never an option for me due to being high risk, I still would have opted for the hospital.
I was lucky enough to have all of children in a private hospital, the ob was amazing and believed in the 'natural way' preferring to only get involved if medically necessary.
I'm greatful she was there as her skills were needed twice.
I would never have felt comfortable birthing at home. I loved knowing that I was safe in hospital, that a major hospital was next door fully equipped with everything needed to intervene in a crisis.
'In the HNEH district in 2014, there were 72 planned homebirths and nine homebirths that resulted in hospital admissions' - Not sure if I am reading that correctly, is that there were 72 planned home births and of those 9 resulted in hospital admissions? Or is it 9 births that occurred outside a hospital that then required hospitalisation? (You do hear about people giving birth in taxi's, etc)
Assuming it is the first one, that is 1 in 8 low risk pregnancies that had a home birth ended up in hospital. Too risky for me.
I read it is 72 born at home and nine transferred (81 total), but could be wrong. Either way I agree, it's too high a risk for me too
It doesn't say when they transferred over to hospital care though, it could have been any time during the pregnancy. Even so, the vaaaaast majority of transfers in labour aren't for emergency situations, they are as a precaution. Of all the homebirths that I've attended where we did transfer in labour it was almost always because the woman was requesting pain relief that is unavailable at home eg. an epidural. A transfer to hospital rarely involves a serious emergency, or worst case, the need to ring an ambulance, you all go in cars.
Anyway, wouldn't you prefer that they go to hospital, rather than being idiots and staying at home?
Of course they should go to hospital, my point was that so many of them go to hospital, you should go to hospital to begin with.
That's just my opinion of course, and it worked for us. For many the benefits of a home birth outweigh the risks and I'm okay with that too.
I hear what you are saying about the non-emergency situations that go to hospital, I just think it adds another variable to what is already a huge situation.
That part of the article was lacking some clarity, I see Hobgoblin had a different interpretation than I did.