In recent history, one item of clothing has created more controversy and divided more opinion than any other.
The hijab has been labelled a tool of oppression and anti-feminist but as Dr Susan Carland explains, for her, her headscarf is a tool of empowerment.
“There are some women who say [wearing the hijab] is a feminist statement,” Carland told Meshel Laurie on The Nitty Gritty Committee.
Listen to Susan talk to Meshel Laurie about her choice, here:
Or download in iTunes, here. Open in a new window, here. Or download Mamamia’s podcast app, here.
“In a society where women’s bodies are used to sell everything from toothpaste to cars, [for those women] covering [their] body is about…saying ‘I’ll decide who sees my body and what parts they get to see by wearing a hijab and covering my body I’m choosing to not have my body commodified in that way,'” Carland said.
Since converting to Islam at 19, Carland has worn her headscarf and today she declares herself “hijabulous” in the description on her Twitter profile.
Susan appearing on Studio Ten.
"In the end, the reason I wear the hijab or the headscarf is as an active worship to God," Carland said. "As a Muslim we believe that everything we do can either be an active worship or just a mindless endeavour.
"It's just about reminding myself who I am, what my values are, why I'm here... as you said [Meshel] it's about having intention and being mindful in all situations," she says.
New Push To Investigate Russell Brand Abuse Allegations
The Quicky
Top Comments
Why don't the men wear it?
"There are some women who say [wearing the hijab] is a feminist statement"
Oh yeah, like wearing a Yellow Jew Star patch is all about empowerment...
Look, if someone wants to wear a gimp mask in general public, that's their choice and no-one should infringe upon that (except of course in situations where face coverings would be legitimately inappropriate for rational identification or security reasons). If, however, there was an entire country, large religion or other powerful group which enforced the mandatory (upon pain of torture and death) wearing of gimp masks for all people of a certain ethnicity, sex, religion or so on, well... then the context is different.
In that scenario, it may be appropriate to take a hard stance against such a symbol of inequality and oppression, and make it clear that it, and everything it stands for, is not acceptable in a civilised society. This is regardless of whether some gimps have been brainwashed from birth to think that they honour their god/leaders/ancestors/<insert-other-manipulable-deference-here> by donning the symbol of oppression, just as it's not relevant that many cut (even infibulated) women consider their genital mutilation to have been justified, and advocate for their daughters to be held down and cut, themselves.
It's unhealthy and offensive to align yourself with symbols or practices which represent such suffering and barbarism, regardless of your intentions. There are all manner of scarves and head coverings that do not have this association, it's not like she's starved for choice. She's either just incredibly disingenuous or actively 'trolling'.
Well said!!!!
What a ridiculous comparison you've made here.
Wearing a hijab is a part of their religion and culture. The only reason you associate it with being 'mandatory' and 'forced upon them' is because of radicalist groups such as ISIS. It is terrible that groups like these force all women to wear the hijab, however this is not the case with Carland and with many other women. Carland herself explained in this article that she would never want to see a woman forced to wear the hijab. Wearing a hijab because you subscribe to the religion is a personal choice.
Furthermore, your comparisons to the 'yellow star Jew patch' is insulting and shows great ignorance on your part. The Nazis forced Jews to wear that patch in the Holocaust in order to identify them, it has no religious meaning to them and it is not in any way comparable to the hijab.