As a doctor, I live to help people – but the ‘wellness industry’ doesn’t see it that way.
I always knew I wanted to be a doctor. I started out at medical school starry eyed. I was careful not to say it in the interview, because everyone warns you that’s the stereotypical answer, but I became a doctor to help people.
I still want to help people – but according to a very large and very vocal “wellness” industry, apparently I’m actually just an evil Boogeyman who is either on the take from Big Pharma or is part of a huge global conspiracy to cover up The Truth.
The Truth varies depending on who you talk to. Pete Evans favours no grains, no milk and something about bone broth by the glass. Jess Ainscough tried coffee enemas and juice (although sadly that didn’t end well). Sarah Wilson blames sugar. A homeopath will sell you very expensive water. For naturopaths The Truth seems to be quite variable, I’ve heard varieties of hair testing, electrodermal testing, odd thyroid testing and a bunch of other “tests”. None of these “experts” seem to think it particularly strange that they contradict each other. What they all have in common is a non-scientific base and a hefty price tag.
Pete Evans is a chef. I have 14 years of university and postgraduate medical training. But here’s the problem: when you get cancer, or autoimmune disease or diabetes everything I say is going to sound pretty bad.
Read more: Sarah Wilson: “Diet doesn’t cure disease and it’s irresponsible to say otherwise.”
The next problem is that I won’t be able to promise you a cure. I can’t. I’ll only be able to tell you the likelihood you might get better. I’ll probably prescribe you something nasty like chemotherapy, which will make you vomit, lose your hair and lose weight. I’ll probably frighten you with my diagnosis and the treatment – because they are both scary.
Top Comments
I agree with most of what you have said, however, I think that the practitioners are not always completely to blame. Many people, like you, want to help people in their career and some of those don't have all the information they need to make a good choice. The government endorses educational courses in all sorts of quackery. More than that, it partially funds some of these courses giving them the appearance of a legitimate profession. Without having some basis in science, how are people to know what is a legitimate treatment and what isn't and what is a legitimate profession and what isn't. People contirubute years of their lives (yes they may be crap but some of these courses do take years) and large amounts of money to study these courses with the very respectable goal of having a career and helping people. At the end of it they are locked in. In that situation it is going to be very difficult to critically analyse your treatments especially if the course itself primes you to defend your chosen field of practice and provides little or no training in scientific thinking.
It is not just treatment that needs to be addressed but also training. The government has to stop endorsing and paying for these courses.
Thank you Dr Riley. Do you have an opinion on daily multivitamins as an alternative to a balanced diet for busy people?