By HAYLEY BYRNES
Almost a year since her heroic solo effort, Olympic gold medallist Sally Pearson is still struggling to gain lucrative sponsorship deals. Could it be, that I dare say perhaps, just perhaps, in this shallow day and age Pearson is simply not “good-looking” enough?
Before you scream “I can’t believe she went there,” let me first state I have always been an avid Pearson supporter.
During the London games last year I pointed out that all Australian media should be ashamed about the copious amount of attention swimmer Stephanie Rice endured by being friends with USA basketballer Kobe Bryant. It was a slap in the face to Pearson’s endeavor.
Oh yeah, that gold medal you won? That’s great but excuse me while I scroll through the latest gallery of Steph and Kobe. After Pearson’s courageous effort, there was talk she could be in the vicinity of earning up to $2 million in sponsorship deals. A year on, we can see this was nothing more than an excited exaggeration.
Again I was outraged when sporting store giant Rebel Sport chose the ever so un-athletic cricket WAG Kyly Boldy. I wrote how Rebel Sport’s managing director Erica Berchtold proclaimed “It’s about time we had a female ambassador associated with sport”.
The frontrunner for the most idiotic comment of the year?
Amongst comments to my then article back in February, I stumbled across this beauty by a reader:
“Men like to watch attractive women, we don’t care about their attributes. Why make that simple fact more complicated than it is”.
Charming. I sure hope this gem of a man one day has a daughter who comes home crying from school because a boy told her she’s ugly. See how you respond then, pal.
Amongst last months hoo-hah of Roxy’s latest TV commercial showcasing surfer Stephanie Gilmore lying around in her knickers, the deemed sexual objectification of Gilmore only boosted the exposure of the 5 time ASP World Champions err, “qualities”. Speaking of, what man doesn’t crush on fellow surfer Sally Fitzgibbon? Let’s be honest guys, do you really care about surfing, or for that matter follow her friend football/cricket darling Elyse Perry’s efforts on the field? The majority of you I’m sure would say no.
Top Comments
In the past Australia never used to win any medals at the Olympics so to win was a big deal. Nowadays we win lots of them so I don't think its such a big drawcard as it used to be and athletes might lose out on sponsorships to civilians etc. For example nowadays chefs seem to be as big celebrities as sportspeople. Also I don't think you necessarily have to be sexy to get sponsorships although Sally certainly looks good enough - its about personality too and I think Sally hasn't seemed that likeable in the past with her perceived "I'm better than everybody else" mentality and moodiness and dismissive attitude to fellow competitors ( that's the impression I had of her so far anyway )
I don't really understand the point here and I do indeed think it's just a sexist rant - sorry about that!
Plenty of male athletes would have the same sponsorship struggles, particularly in sports like this which aren't plastered across the back pages for six months of the year, or leading sports bulletins on the evening news. And that's what marketing and sponsorship is about - getting your brand noticed as much as possible.
Michelle Jenneke only lists two sponsors on her official website. Sally Pearson also lists two sponsors. Hence, on the surface of it, there doesn't appear to be any benefit gained by Michelle Jenneke's photo shoots, correct?