A medical perspective on the passing of Jess Ainscough.
As we reported here yesterday, 30 year old Jess Ainscough, known as the “Wellness Warrior” has died from cancer. After being diagnosed with a rare form of cancer aged 22, she chose to reject all forms of traditional medicine and embark upon an evangelical path of alternate treatments – none of which had any scientific evidence of success. She started a Wellness Warrior website, wrote books and became very vocally outspoken against many forms of traditional medicine including cancer treatment and even vaccination.
You can read about that here, including the devastating death of her mother only 14 months ago after she was diagnosed with breast cancer and similarly refused all traditional medicine. Of course, Jess and her mother had every right to choose how to treat their illnesses. Where this becomes more complex and troubling is the evangelism with which Jess took to her alternate treatment while projecting an image that was the picture of health. She amassed tens of thousands of followers, sold books and products and influenced many many people.
A young woman has died and that is a tragedy no matter how or why it happened. However by living her life as a crusader against traditional medicine and advocate for ‘natural’ cancer treatment, it’s impossible (and some would say irresponsible) to ignore the circumstances surrounding Jess Ainscough’s death.
After much discussion among the Mamamia team (some of whom knew Jess or had friends who knew her), we believe it’s possible to be sensitive and respectful while reporting some facts. Many Mamamia readers have asked questions about the reasons for Jess’s death and the progression of her cancer.
Top Comments
Thank you for writing this article.
My cousin was diagnosed with epitheloid sarcoma in 2007.
Over the years he became an avid follower of Jessica’s teachings. Like Jessica he
had also decided against amputation, in favour of alternative medicinal
therapies.
He passed away very unexpectedly earlier this month. I knew
very little about his condition and only recently have been reading up about
epitheloid sarcoma, and Jessica’s teachings. I realise that this article was written
more than six months back, but just in case anyone reads this I just wanted to
reiterate what has been stated.
It was completely at Jessica’s discretion to opt out of
conventional medicinal. What I don’t agree with was her wrongful promotion of
such information.
Her teachings amassed a great following online from people
all over the world. Her followers were strictly following her recommended vegan
based liquid only diet. This diet not only lacked a lot of essential nutrients,
but it also lacked scientific grounding.
I think that even though it is completely tragic that she
eventually succumbed to the disease, what makes it worse is she also influenced
other sufferers, and who inevitably suffered a similar fate to herself.
My cousin being one of them.
In coming to terms with his death, what saddens me the most
is that it was seemingly preventable.
Chemotherapy scam quackery ALWAYS LEADS TO DEATH eventually.
I think Jess could have gone to Mexico for supervised Gerson treatment or intravenous Laetrile or intravenous VitC or PNC-27 or gone to Rome to Dr Simoncini
She did go to Mexico for supervised Gerson "treatment." As she wrote on her blog, she spent her family's entire savings to do it. It did not cure her cancer, because veggie juices and coffee enemas don't cure cancer.
Nobody denies Ms Aynscough the right to choose her own treatment and to follow her own path as she did. She lived live as she wanted to and I admire her for it. The problem is that she promoted inaccurate information and treatments to others on social media that might have influenced people who may well have otherwise chosen a different path that would save their life.