By SAM SQUIERS
Oh. So, Lonsdale’s doing lingerie now?
That’s what I first thought when they announced their new campaign on instagram recently. There was Annette Melton (stunning model and new Lonsdale ambassador), rolling around seductively on a bed in her underwear. Surely they couldn’t be trying to sell sports clothes? I can’t see a single piece of sportswear. Just a bed, sheets, and a whole lot of skin. Hang on was that a nipple?
The video campaign goes even further, bringing out the scissors to make a few ‘changes’. The T’shirt (which I assume they’re advertising) is cut back to show more breast (no bra, who needs a bra while playing sport? Right?). Then all of a suddenly she’s topless, in her undies with poses more suited to an FHM magazine than an advertising campaign for women’s sports clothes.
This sure ain’t making me rush out and buy any Lonsdale clothes any time soon.
It’s a common question often asked in Women’s sports and fashion. Do you need sex to sell?
The answer was undeniably no when the Women’s Health Magazine decided to have naked body painted models at, ironically, their “I Support Women in Sports Awards” last week.
Top Comments
Lonsdale is the worst "sports" brand anyway. They're trash compared to adidas, nike, puma and even reebok. That's why they have to resort to trashy ads to get attention.
I consider myself a very athletic person. I
train at least 5 times a week, two times a day. In my opinion, I think it’s a
great ad. Because I train as often as I do, I have been categorised as “one of
the boys”. Every girl wants to feel sexy, regardless of how many times they
train or what body type they have. It’s great to see the mixer of sports and
sexy combined. I want to look and feel sexy when I train and after I train. Although
a model has been used in this campaign rather than an actual athlete is
irrelevant. She is still a female, a sexy one. It does not matter, its all
about how you feel, and this campaign – I feel empowers women of all shapes and
sizes.
How does it empower women when its so obviously airbrushed and photoshopped? You can tell when something is airbrushed/re-touched just by looking at the skin. Its pretty obvious. If they want to empower women, why not show the real woman as she is? Also, why does she have to be in suggestive poses to be sexy or empowered? Its not about the lack of clothing, its about the re-touching of the image and the poses. Why is that women have to pose suggestively in order to look sexy and become empowered? Yet most men DON'T have to do the same thing to be empowered. I'm sorry, but I don't buy the "empowered" reason.