by JASMINE GARNSWORTHY
Do NOT ask Christina Hendricks about her figure. Is that clear?
Hendricks is the LA-based actress who plays Joan Harris in the cult TV series Mad Men and she was in Sydney last week for the 2012 Specsavers Spectacle Wearer of the Year competition.
After the now internationally-famous incident involving a question about her body shape (and used the word “full-figured”) that caused Hendricks to terminate the interview and complain the question was rude, all further interviews came with strict conditions.
There is to be NO mention of weight, shape, size, body or body image. Fortunately, I hadn’t been intending to.
As a style editor, Mad Men is superb TV. The polished, 50s/60s fashion is almost a character. I love the contrast between Joan’s sultry, come-hither wardrobe and Betty’s domestic goddess A-line dresses. (If you have never watched, what’s wrong with you? Get to the itunes store immediately and download yourself series one – you’ll be hooked in minutes).
In a very business-like hotel room surrounded by anxious PR reps and a queue of other nervous journos, Christina and I chatted about pencil skirts, Mad Men and Ryan Gosling. Here’s how it went down:
JG: Do you have much influence in Joan’s wardrobe in Mad Men?
Top Comments
Great interview!! It was very well translated into type. Often reading interviews you don't get the feeling that two people actually had a conversation. This was a great piece, clearly Christina felt comfortable, as did Jasmine. There is a clear dialogue, which was hard to see even in the video with Kate Waterhouse.
I loved the questions, as Christina has great style, both personally and when playing her role as Joan on Mad Men. Many women will find her style inspiring, and appreciate her taking the time to talk about it. ;-)
"Do NOT ask Christina Hendricks about her figure. Is that clear?"
This is just so incredibly offensive. As a woman (SIZE not disclosed), this is abhorrent.
Christina Hendriks, intelligent, interesting, successful actress was offended to be asked how she feels about her body.
Damn right it's offensive.
But I think it hits home even harder and makes it sadder that this VERY WEBSITE was defending the interviewer in a previous post, labeling CH as "precious" amongst other things.
Truly, I want to swear at MM right now for their hypocrisy on this. This very case was your chance to SHINE AND SAY WE REJECT women being defined by their bodies, and "synonymous" with XYZ descriptions.
And heaven help me if I don't get deleted.
How dare Ms Waterhouse, or anyone else think it's ok to ask this. I've NEVER EVER EVER EVER seen/heard of a male actor asked about how he's inspired other "plus sizes" with his body type.
Hi Kate
I'm sorry to hear you feel that way.
If you go back and look at the story we did on the interview between Kate Waterhouse and Christina Hendricks, you'll find that we did not take the angle that CH was being precious. We asked readers the question: Was she being precious? Or was she right to be offended?
All interviewers make mistakes. It happens. That interview was handled badly by Kate Waterhouse but I don't think it's up to us to bag either woman for how they behaved.
That's why we tried to simply report the story and not offer an op-ed.
We are big fans of Christina Hendricks which is why we were thrilled for Jasmine to do this terrific interview with her.
Hope that helps clear things up a little.
I'm kind of surprised Mamamia - of all sites - felt the need to ask its readers the question of whether or not it was 'precious' of Christina to react the way she did. I'd have thought for sure your writers would have defended her reaction. She's entitled to her feelings, it's not for Kate or anyone else to decide how she should react.
I read Kate's follow up article and cringed. She really doesn't get it, does she? So you think Christina should have been more like Kim Kardashian, huh? Thank GOD she's not, and doesn't use her body as currency on every possible occasion (including when flogging diet pills...)
I have to disagree with that Bec. The fact that this site has constantly reported that CH terminated the interview due to KW`s questions is inaccurate reporting. The previous article did imply that CH is a prima donna.
I thought Kate's follow up article was good, much better than the original interview (which was a bit of a dud, so it needed to be!). She outlined that everyone's bodies are different, and that's a good thing. That there are things that everyone wants to change about their bodies and can't. And that Hollywood should embrace more different body types.
It's her job to talk about clothes and hence the bodies that the clothes hang on is a natural progression from that.