It’s one of the biggest bugbears of clothes shopping: You walk into a store, see an item of clothing you like and decide to try it on – unless you are a seasoned shopper or have a good eye for fit, chances are you’ll take up to four sizes of the same garment into the changing room.
And now, a US apparel fit expert has confirmed what we’ve long suspected: Aussie clothing brands offer some of the poorest fits in the world.
Ed Gribbin, whose company boasts body shape data collected from more than 300,000 people in 24 countries, says that Australian has outdated notions when it comes to ‘progressive’ grading between sizes.
”Our theory, which has been adopted by clients worldwide, is that grading between sizes should be proportional to the size of the body.” he told The Age. ”So the difference between a size 6 and 8 shouldn’t be the same as the difference between a size 18 and 20. But in Australia it is.”
Gribbin says it’s the petite and plus-size shoppers at either end of the size spectrum that it affects the most.
“It significantly limits the number of large people and the number of smaller people who are going to find a good fit when they go shopping,” Gribban says.
There you have it, actual, real evidence of why you can’t find clothes that fit properly.
As for a universal sizing system across all clothes, in all countries, in all of the universe (IN OUR DREAMS)?
Gribban doesn’t think it’s such a good idea.
”When a brand focuses on a particular look or aesthetic and then goes out to achieve that, almost by definition they’re legislating who can buy their product and who can’t … I don’t think it’s in the brand’s best interest to cater to everybody.”
So in other words, prepare yourselves for more vanity sizing.
Don’t know what vanity sizing is? Read on:
Top Comments
I've noticed a very frustrating trend emerging of Aussie stores ending their range at size 12 now rather than 14, taking it upon themselves to deem 14 'plus-size' when a couple of years ago it was considered part of that mainstream spectrum. As someone who has to shop anywhere between a 12 and a 16, depending on however the store feels like sizing their gear, this is beyond frustrating. Manufacturers shouldn't be able to decide to ignore a size completely and leave them with nothing to wear.
That's capitalism for you, they can do whatever they like and have no duty to provide anyone with clothes...frustrating though
I am fed up with being sized out of so many brands as they make their clothes larger and larger. 20 years ago I fitted a size 8, now the size 6 is way too big in most labels. Even the Country Road 4 is big. David Lawrence, Sportscraft , Esprit and Veronica Maine size 6's get bigger every year and would be 1-2 sizes too big yet 10 years ago I could fit them. I no longer enjoy shopping and just don't bother looking most of the time because it is so demoralising seeing everything that is way too big. The smaller size 6's e.g. Portmans that are more likely to fit me are designed for the teen to 20's age group and in general are not the sort of thing I want to wear in my 40's. As for swimwear! The only thing that isn't a size D+ cup is a triangle bikini which is all that will fit me. I am now doing more clothes shopping online as I have to search far and wide for clothing that is small enough.
Lol country road has the BIGGEST sizes, I have a size 4 skirt from them and I am normally a size 8, I guess it's because most australians are getting bigger?