Woody Allen has directed 46 films over the course of his career.
He has been nominated for 24 Academy Awards, and won four times.
He has been called a treasure of the cinema and was recently recognised with a lifetime achievement award.
And according to his adopted daughter, Dylan Farrow, he is also a child molester.
Allen’s adopted daughter with Mia Farrow, Dylan Farrow, has published an open letter in The New York Times this weekend, containing allegations that the director molested her in her youth.
Dylan writes:
[W]hen I was seven years old, Woody Allen took me by the hand and led me into a dim, closet-like attic on the second floor of our house. He told me to lay on my stomach and play with my brother’s electric train set. Then he sexually assaulted me. He talked to me while he did it, whispering that I was a good girl, that this was our secret, promising that we’d go to Paris and I’d be a star in his movies.
In 1992, Dylan’s adoptive parents Mia Farrow and Woody Allen split. Their divorce happened in the wake of an affair between Allen and Soon-Yi Previn (Mia Farrow’s adopted daughter with composer Andre Previn).
At the same time, Farrow accused Allen of abusing Dylan. According to the Times, Acting Justice Elliott Wilk of State Supreme Court said then that, “it was unlikely that Mr. Allen could be prosecuted for sexual abuse based on the evidence,” and he was never charged with a crime. The newspaper continued, “While a team of experts concluded that Dylan was not abused, the judge said he found the evidence inconclusive.”
The controversy filled column inches upon column inches – but this open letter is the first time that Dylan herself has written about the accusations of abuse.
Top Comments
1. Personally, I have never liked Woody Allen, don't really know why. Guess the thought of him marrying his step daughter was disgusting enough to make me stay away from him or any of his films.
2. I believe we need to give victims/survivors's words more value . I hate seeing people throwing their opinions about whether he molested her or not. None of us were witnesses to her dismay, so what the heck are we doing judging or trying to analyse this psyco (allen of course) to afterwards say if we think he did or did not molest her. People's testimony should be giving utmost importance. Opposite to ridiculing and judging the veracity of itself.
3. Being a crime that took place so long ago, we could think that it is not important any more to try and put this twit in jail, or have him accused of anything. What it is important is that this is the experience is told by someone who grew up with the person accused and will for sure have much more insight in his ways of being. Which in the end shows that he could, as we have for such a long time suspected, insane in the membrane.
4. Does this gives us the right to either love or hate this art work? I guess this is up to each one of us. If you are cool with it, love him, if you support Dylan, and all women out there who might have gone through something like this, don't give allen your money. That's out only way to exert our vote.
Yes we need to give attention to victims, at the same time you can't just believe what a person says without proof, otherwise anyone could accuse anyone of anything!
I support any victim of any situation like this (obviously) but NO FACTS HAVE BEEN VERIFIED - so you're essentially saying you believe her just because she is saying it.
I'm not sure myself, I've always thought Woody seems like a very shady dude, he married his partners adopted daughter ffs.
At the same time innocent until proven guilty is important, for all of us.
May all paedophiles rot in a jail cell.
Having said that, paedophile or not Woody Allen is a brilliant director and saying he isn't because of something he may or may not have done is ridiculous. He is a master of his craft and regardless of what he's being accused of he will remain as such.
They are, in my opinion, two entirely separate situations.