by LUCY CHESTERTON AND JANE CARO
Jane: I was lucky enough to get to meet Lucy in person on a panel about feminism on Mornings on Channel 9 recently. I was able to apologise –again – but this time on television for hitting “send” in anger, in response to Lucy’s piece about feminism on Mamamia.
We also found that while we differed in some ways, fundamentally our belief in the importance of feminism is the same. If you saw the program, you will know that Lucy and I agreed to co-write an article about feminism and what it means to both of us. Here it is.
Feminism seems to confuse many people. They seem to believe that wanting to be equal means wanting to be the same. It doesn’t, it never has. It simply means wanting equal opportunities, equal pay for the same work and an equal right to control and manage your own life and decisions. A feminist believes that a woman is of equal value to a man, not the same as one, but she is also someone who wants to be seen as a human being first and as a woman second.
As a feminist, I seek respect over love – though I also believe that without real respect there is no real love – and this means I have largely (but not entirely) freed myself from the need for approval.
Feminism is not an organization. There is no sisterhood, no hierarchy, no tabernacle. I believe that feminism is actually a point of view; a way of seeing the world that puts a woman at the centre of her own life, rather than on the periphery of someone elses, and does not then call her selfish for doing so.
Top Comments
(Ciscentric) Feminism never killed anyone? Wow, that's an impressive bit of trans erasure:
http://www.transadvocate.co...
what i'm noticing is what seems a pattern of internet enabled men engaging in the world of internet enabled feminism (which is all the middle class liberal white brand - on account of it being via the INTERNET - which is a middle class commodity) .... yet there are quite a few of us middle class (well quite short of middle class myself) but internet enabled feminists, who have studied it and care deeply about it, who are less interested in what men and women think about each other, and what they all think their roles should be and what they think their incomes should be equal to, and whether they think liberal middle class women have equality yet .... and keep coming up against people who don't really get that feminism in it's grungy, rights based variety is actually about protecting women from being attacked or killed by men, it is about them having food, and employment opportunities, housing, and it is about them maintaining relationships with their children, that for eons have been sabotaged by middle class men (who made the laws, just cos they did .... not cos of any other fact than that is just what happened in our history) ... so take it seriously or don't, but please, if you are a middle class bloke who is arguing that some of the internet enabled, blogging, commenting feminists are a little too "extreme, defensive, victimised" or whatever other patronising, paternalistic term you wish to ascribe, please understand that i do not take you seriously ....
Every justification you have written for your grungy feminism (having food, equality in employment etc) is not relevant to 99% of Australian women in 2012, as all of those battles have been fought and won. Yet the flag wavers think this is still the justification in modern Australia for a movment that is only concerned with one gender. It's all so last century in Australia.
99%. that's a big call. an inaccurate one. poverty is very real in this country sunshine, as is violence .....