It appears that believing in women’s rights and equality is no longer a prerequisite for being the Minister for Women.
Or should I say, for being the Minister who assists the Prime Minister on women’s issues, because who needs a Minister for Women when we’ve got Tony, eh?
In fact, the woman who holds that very title has used the week of International Women’s Day to declare herself undecided on the whole ‘feminism’ thing.
Minister Michaelia Cash was asked by a journalist at the National Press Club yesterday whether or not she considered herself a feminist. To which the Minister deliberately dodged giving an affirmative answer. She said:
“I consider myself a very lucky person whose parents told their four children to achieve, you work hard… All I know is that I believe in women … but I also believe in men.”
Right. Thanks for making yourself so abundantly clear Minister.
But the Minister didn’t stop there. In an interview with Fairfax published today, the Minister was once again asked about feminism and whether she was reluctant to associate herself with the term. She said:
In terms of feminism, I’ve never been someone who really associates with that movement.
Groan.
Even though Prime Minister Tony Abbott claimed to be a feminist this week, it seems that the woman assisting him on developing policies and strategies to advance the status of women in our community, ain’t so eager. Her ministerial colleague and Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party Julie Bishop doesn’t shy away from the label; nor does Deputy Labor Leader Tanya Plibersek or Greens Leader Christine Milne. But Minister Cash rejects the term despite the fact that her many and considerable achievements in public life would never have been possible had it not been for the feminist movement.
Top Comments
Julie Bishop? Not a feminist?
http://www.smh.com.au/feder...
I 100% agree with you, but I feel the movement as a whole has some PR issues and that is what has led to this unwillingness to be called a feminist but a belief in equality. This is just my take to get rid of the stigma associated with the word;
-Slap down actual misandrists in your the movement and do it quickly. If there's a debate regarding feminism (whether it be in a forum or comments section or anywhere), all it takes is one misandrist comment from one fruitcake feminist (who doesn't represent actual feminists) and that becomes the focus. When it happens that person needs to be slapped down by other feminists so that people know the movement doesn't stand for man hating.
-Occasionally pay attention to the odd men's issue. We talk about objectification yet I still feel the role of father is undervalued and underappreciated in our society i.e. all the useless-daggy-unorganised dad commercials. By giving some airtime and focus to showing how our current system also harms men the movement appears less threatening.
-I know this irks some people, but the name in itself is gendered. I know feminism started because females were oppressed, and its natural it took that role. But as gains are made (I know there is a long way to go), moving to "egalitarianism" wouldn't hurt.
I know people will say "we shouldn't have to do this, of course we're not misandrists" or "if men believe all feminists are bad they're idiots" or "men's issues aren't our issues" but the silence is unhelpful and hasn't been helpful so far. If it was, this article wouldn't be needed.