Meet Jonah Takalua; a crass, weirdly endearing teenage boy from Tonga. He verbally abuses his teachers, bullies his school friends, and disrespects every figure of authority in his life. He’s the walking, talking embodiment of every Islander stereotype we have.
He’s also, incidentally, a fictional character played by a 39-year-old white guy in black make-up – or technically (according to the character’s creator Chris Lilley) a dark spray tan.
This isn’t the first controversial character Chris Lilley has created. From Summer Heights High and Angry Boys, to Ja’mie the man has made a career of risque imitation, dressing up as a black rap artist, a Japanese mother, a Chinese musical theatre enthusiast, a teenage private school girl, a middle-aged woman, a gay drama teacher, and bogan twin boys. He’s versatile, to say the least.
Lilley’s a human chameleon, and he’s brilliant. But he’s also wildly offensive, in a way that as a society we would usually condemn. ‘Blackface’ started centuries ago when people blackened their face with grease, dirt or paint to play black people – who were always portrayed as vulgar, sexually inappropriate, uneducated, or feral. Since the 1800s, it’s been recognised as a malicious, oppressive form of “entertainment” that plays up the disempowerment of black people.
Top Comments
Not a critically-written article, that's for sure. And I'll explore that.
1. The article author has not consulted any people that identify with the cultural background of other Lilley characters. [...Japanese mother, a Chinese musical theatre enthusiast, a teenage private school girl, a middle-aged woman, a gay drama teacher, and bogan twin boys..."]
2. A) The satire of Jonah is lost on the audience because it is associated with a horrid, racist history (blackface, though this is differentiated as brownface), thereby making his portrayal "too loaded". [Morgan Godffrey: "A white man in brownface is too loaded to make an effective point."]
2. B) This implies that:
I) if the other characters had similar cultural ties to a racist history within Australia then their satirical comment would be lost.
Ii) the scenario in (2BI) is not the case in Australia.
Iii) if the audience was not so aware of blackface or if blackface was not to prominent in the audience history, then the satirical value of Jonah would be successfully, intelligently portrayed to the audience.
3. The audience is ignorant of Polynesian culture, [in closing paragraph] and either:
A) is aware of Polynesian culture and people, and therefore this portrayal is either absurd or clearly a satire
...or...
B) is only aware of racist and derogatory stereotypes of the culture and it's people
or
C) is completely unaware of Polynesian culture and people, therefore this portrayal is their only exposure
...and either...
I) they can't figure out that it's a satire on a stereotype, or
Ii) they believe this is a true representation and allow this depiction to...think racist thoughts about Polynesians. Really. It's that easy to become a racist?
D) the audience is racist.
Ridicule on the basis of race is racist and racially offensive. Ridicule on the basis of being a dumb teenager is not racist. The ridicule in this recent instance and episode and the way it was promoted to the public, was directed at race and racist.