A dangerous person is coming to Australia.
When she gets here, she will speak in public places to enthralled groups of supporters. She will spread a dangerous message.
And it’s perfectly possible that this message could end lives.
This woman is not a terrorist, but she is an extremist.
In March, prominent American anti-vaccination campaigner, Sherri Tenpenny is scheduled to give a series of seminars in Australia designed to encourage parents to not vaccinate their children.
In these seminars being promoted by the Australian Vaccination Skeptics Network, Sherri Tenpenny will apparently speak about “the truths about vaccination risks”, “your rights regarding vaccinations for child care and school”, and “how to keep babies and children healthy according to nature”.
Look at this: the devastating effect of anti-vaxxers on the world.
Sherri Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor from Ohio in the United States. Her website says that she provides “vaccine information you won’t hear from your paediatrician”. She claims to be “an outspoken advocate for…the right to refuse vaccination.” In addition, she “offers hope through her unique treatments” for patients who have been “vaccine-injured.”
She is on the record as objecting to childhood vaccinations, as well as Gardasil (the Australian-made vaccine that prevents the human papillomavirus, a major cause of cervical cancer), and the flu shot.
Top Comments
Here are some facts you didn't bother considering:
1) Wakefield never said to stop vaccinating, he said that the MMR required further research and that HE would personally recommend choosing the individual vaccines that were still on the schedule.
2) It was over 6 months AFTER the press conference that the pharmaceutical companies ordered the UK government to remove the monovalent options from the schedule. So who is REALLY to blame for parents choosing not to vaccinate against measles? Wakefield, who said to vaccinate against measles, for the pharmaceutical industry that removed that option for parents?
3) Wakefield's research was not fraudulent. The other authors retracted an "interpretation" of the data. They have never once said the study was fraudulent, that is another interpretation by a journalist, Brian Deer, which was then repeated Ad nauseam by the mainstream media and the government regulatory agencies who are responsible for making vaccine manufacturers a lot of money. Pediatric vaccines are the fastest growing profit segment for pharmaceutical companies as many big name drugs are approaching the end of their licensing.
4) It is simply impossible to resolve the idea that Wakefield was creating his own measles vaccine with the intent to replace the MMR, given that there was already a measles vaccine on the schedule which he even RECOMMENDED at the 1998 press conference, something Paul Offit, vaccine inventor turned millionaire vaccine spokesperson, conveniently forgets in his book.
5) Brian Deer's investigation was paid for by The Sunday Times. The owner of the newspaper at this time was Rupert Murdoch's son James Murdoch, who at the time of the investigation was sitting on the board of GlaxoSmithKline making £70,000/year in a non-executive director position.
6) Elsevier pulled the Lancet study, the CEO of Elsevier at the time was Sir Crispin Davis, who at the time of the investigation was sitting on the board of GlaxoSmithKline making £70,000/year in a non-executive director position.
Yes there is fact and fiction. Here is a fact, no study has ever compared autism rates between fully vaccinated and fully unvaccinated individuals. (IOM, 2013)
If people think this lady has no credentials to talk about the harm that vaccines cause then take a look at The Silent Epidemic on youtube and you will find many with the highest credentials informing the hypotised misinformed of the media suppressed but obvious dangers of vaccines. Don't just go blah blah blah about it; WATCH IT