Pass this on to everyone you know.
To me, the concept of consent has always seemed pretty straightforward: Don’t have sex with someone unless you know they are 100% into it. Simple, right?
And yet, there are some who seem to struggle with the (apparently very complicated) rule of “Do not have sex with someone who doesn’t want to have sex with you.”
So one utterly brilliant blogger has come up with the perfect metaphor to describe the idea behind consent to those who just cannot get their head around it.
Related: A must-read for any mother with a son, and every girl who should know her rights.
Rockstar Dinosaur Pirate Princess has replaced the word “sex” with “tea” to make it perfectly clear to everyone what the rules are.
It’s funny, it’s smart and it’s just. So. Obvious.
See for yourself:
Whoever you are initiating sexytimes with, just make sure they are actually genuinely up for it. That’s it. It’s not hard. Really.
If you’re still struggling, just imagine instead of initiating sex, you’re making them a cup of tea.
You say “hey, would you like a cup of tea?” and they go “omg fuck yes, I would fucking LOVE a cup of tea! Thank you!*” then you know they want a cup of tea.
If you say “hey, would you like a cup of tea?” and they um and ahh and say, “I’m not really sure…” then you can make them a cup of tea or not, but be aware that they might not drink it, and if they don’t drink it then – this is the important bit – don’t make them drink it. You can’t blame them for you going to the effort of making the tea on the off-chance they wanted it; you just have to deal with them not drinking it. Just because you made it doesn’t mean you are entitled to watch them drink it.
If they say “No thank you” then don’t make them tea. At all. Don’t make them tea, don’t make them drink tea, don’t get annoyed at them for not wanting tea. They just don’t want tea, ok?
They might say “Yes please, that’s kind of you” and then when the tea arrives they actually don’t want the tea at all. Sure, that’s kind of annoying as you’ve gone to the effort of making the tea, but they remain under no obligation to drink the tea. They did want tea, now they don’t. Sometimes people change their mind in the time it takes to boil that kettle, brew the tea and add the milk. And it’s ok for people to change their mind, and you are still not entitled to watch them drink it even though you went to the trouble of making it.
If they are unconscious, don’t make them tea. Unconscious people don’t want tea and can’t answer the question “do you want tea” because they are unconscious.
Ok, maybe they were conscious when you asked them if they wanted tea, and they said yes, but in the time it took you to boil that kettle, brew the tea and add the milk they are now unconscious. You should just put the tea down, make sure the unconscious person is safe, and – this is the important bit – don’t make them drink the tea. They said yes then, sure, but unconscious people don’t want tea.
If someone said yes to tea, started drinking it, and then passed out before they’d finished it, don’t keep on pouring it down their throat. Take the tea away and make sure they are safe. Because unconscious people don’t want tea. Trust me on this.
If someone said “yes” to tea around your house last saturday, that doesn’t mean that they want you to make them tea all the time. They don’t want you to come around unexpectedly to their place and make them tea and force them to drink it going “BUT YOU WANTED TEA LAST WEEK”, or to wake up to find you pouring tea down their throat going “BUT YOU WANTED TEA LAST NIGHT”.
See? It’s not actually that complicated after all.
Top Comments
This blogger is writing to women. I think most men tuned out after "cup of tea"
I think this is great BUT for anyone who has actually been raped, we know with 100% certainty that our attackers knew we did not want to have have sex with them. This is drunk or not. I know this is hard to swallow but these boys don't care, that's why they're rapists.
I am positive you are right. However, it might help shut up some of the relentless apologists for rape who attempt in every comment section to convince us that the poor boy was just confused after all.
Can you give examples from this site of where rape apologists have said the boy was just confused?