OK, reality television, the gig is up. We’ve reached peak ridiculousness, and it’s time to shut. it. down.
A group of ordinary, compassionate human beings (us, it was us) have pinpointed the exact moment the genre of reality TV went too far.
Network executives have decided it’s be a mad cool idea to put heavily pregnant women in the jungle and film them giving birth on a pile of leaves. That’s when.
Lifetime Television (in the US, obviously) have just announced a reality TV program called Born in The Wild. As the name alarmingly suggests, real actual tiny baby humans will be born in the wild – with absolutely no medical assistance provided. It’s “inspired by” a youtube video called Birth In Nature, that was viewed 20 million times (featuring the woman you can see in these photos).
Here, read Lifetime’s borderline-pathological summary of their bat-shit crazy television program:
“From the mood swings and false alarms to the crazy food cravings, learning to expect the unexpected becomes a way of life in the final days leading up to birth…. But what happens when the craziest experience of a woman’s life becomes truly wild, and soon-to-be parents decide to take on an unassisted birth in the outdoors? ‘Born in the Wild’ will document the journeys of young, expectant parents who have chosen to give birth ‘in the wild.’”
‘Unassisted birth in the outdoors’. Meaning there will be a full camera crew surrounding a naked woman squatting on a patch of swamp/dirt/exotic lilypad to perform the casual task of popping out a human being. Without medical assistance of any sort. On television. Having signed away any legal liability or risk in the crazy-ass contract given to them by the network. Who will profit from the show no matter what the outcome.
Top Comments
I just wish with all my heart that for every woman who chooses an unassisted birth, that they could somehow "give" that privilege of medical care to a woman in the developing world. On your own doorstep - the Melanesian South Pacific: Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu - women are regularly dying and suffering lifelong conditions from lack of medical care during birth. Not because they don't want it: they can't get it; whether they live in the urban centres and have to queue at the hospital on urine-covered floors (which is usually where they give birth), or whether it's because they're a 5 hour drive, 3 hour hike away from the nearest kind of health clinic - assuming you are well enough to walk three hours, and can somehow conjure up a car to drive another five, once in labour. I wonder if every woman choosing unassisted birth would donate the cost of medical care to an NGO working on MNCH instead...
Pregnant women are not sick. In the UK, women are encouraged to have home births assisted by midwives - unless there are abnormalities, such as gestational diabetes. Shame this isn't encouraged in Australia.
I feel America should look to the UK and the Netherlands for examples of proper encouragement of home-births for low risk women . good for them!