Update:
Police have confirmed that tradesman William Harrie Spedding is not a suspect in the case of the missing three-year-old William Tyrell, Guardian Australia reports.
Police have concluded their two days spent combing through the 63-year-old NSW man’s home in the search for clues in the Tyrell case and have since removed crime scene tape surrounding the home.
Spedding has now returned to the property.
There has been an outpouring of support from friends and family of Spedding in publicity surrounding the case.
Previously, Mamamia wrote…
Crime scene tape has been removed from the home of a tradesman, William Harrie Spedding, as police conclude their search at the property.
Spedding was recently questioned over the disappearance of toddler William Tyrell.
The search, conducted on Wednesday, included the excavation of some land and the draining of the Bonny Hills property’s septic tank. No charges have been laid.
Mr Spedding’s daughter-in-law Amy Spedding has spoken on behalf of the family in full support of his innocence. In an interview with Fairfax Media, Mrs Spedding said: “We fully support him. We know that he has had nothing to do with this”.
“We have spoken to him. Obviously he is very upset, his wife is devastated. Basically we spoke to him and said ‘We love and have your back and we support you 100 per cent’,” she added.
Top Comments
Oh no! I was hoping this was it. Those parents need to know either way...sitting and waiting must be a special kind of torture...
A repair man not showing up and a couple of posts saying the police should keep looking doesn't seem enough reason to publicly name and shame this guy, I hope the police have more to go on than we know about, otherwise having the media showing pictures of him, his wife and there business could be unfairly damaging their reputations and their financial futures.
Don't we find out the person of interest in a lot of cases and when people go to trial/court we also know they are implicated? Many go on to clear their names or there is not enough evidence to find them guilty but we still know of them.
Not to this extent generally and even if it was that still doesn't make what the media did right. Suppose this case remains unsolved, if you lived in the communities his repair business covers and you have children would you call him and have him work in your home?, I suspect not. If the only information the media had was that he was supposed to return with a part for a washing machine on the day of William's disappearance but did not attend after being told on the phone not to (a job he quoted prior to William arriving at his grandmother's house?), and that he has commented about the case online (as are we) then yes I'd call that unfairly damaging his reputation and most likely his business.