By ROSIE WATERLAND
A ‘Christian Lifestyle Blogger’ in the US has decided to define what ‘Female Empowerment’ means in a cheeky way, by writing an ironic list that describes examples that are the complete opposite of female empowerment.
JOKE! I wish. The list is serious. She just has the concept of female empowerment ARSE BACKWARDS. And she’s using the Spice Girls motto to spread her f*cked up message.
So… Something has to be done.
Jennifer Flanders blogs at “Loving Life at Home‘ and describes herself as a “faith-walking, husband-loving, home-schooling, hymn-singing, deep-thinking, book-writing, hand-crafting, life-savoring mother of twelve.”
And that’s totally fine, if that’s your bag. But remember that this is the same woman who made some light waves on the interwebs a few weeks ago for insisting that wives need to be constantly sexing up their husbands or the devil will intervene by forcing him to take his penis elsewhere.
So in the interests of full disclosure, Flanders should probably add ‘confused feminist’ to her list as well, especially since she has influence over a pretty large following. Because if this list is what she thinks constitutes Girl Power, she be very confused. Let’s break this down, using some choice quotes from Jennifer’s latest post ‘Girl Power: Don’t Waste It’.
Flanders opens by talking about why she decided to write the ultimate Girl Power list:
“In the past half-century, women have spent so much time focused on fighting for equality and closing the perceived gender gap that much of the very real power unique to our sex has been lost: relinquished, squandered, forgotten, or ignored.”
Um… Perceived gender gap? Uh oh… Here’s the list itself:
1. “An empowered woman INSPIRES those around her.”
That sounds fair. But hold up…
“A hurricane makes a great show of brute force, but look at the destruction, devastation, and despair that follow in its wake. Gentle spring rains may never make headline news, but they pack a potency we’d do well to emulate — the power to refresh and rejuvenate, to nurture and nourish, to bring life and growth and beauty.”
So, basically, don’t be a bitch or speak your mind. That’s not what ladies do.
Top Comments
Woah! So clearly my point here did not translate!
I really don't know how else to defend myself except to reiterate that I'm not sayng you CAN'T be empowered if you live a life like hers. Of course you can. That's why I ended on the point about 'choice'. Female empowerment is about women being able to choose the life they want to live, whether or not I or anybody else agrees with it.
The piece wasn't about saying her life isn't empowered because I don't agree with her. It was about pointing out how ridiculous it is that she has defined female empowerment as not applying to women who are homosexual, women who have sex before marriage, women who have had abortions and women who don't or can't have children. That leaves out a hell of a lot of women.
So if you're gay, you can't be empowered? If you don't have children, you can't be empowered? If you have sex before marriage, you can't be empowered? If you have an abortion, you can't be empowered?
How ridiculous.
By saying you can't be empowered if any of those factors apply to you, she was the one trying to define what choices women should make. I was just pointing out how unfair that is.
Was I overly sarcastic? Yes. But I did not once say her choices were wrong. Seriously - live and let live. But I still think she IS confused about girl power, because writing a list in which you say female empowerment only applies to a select few is just not what choice is about.
It was the exclusivity, and as a result, the implict bigotry in her list that angered me, not the way the chooses to live her life, which is completely up to her.
She's free to make her choices, there's nothing wrong with her choices. Like I say in the post 'that's totally fine, if that's your bag'.
What was wrong? Writing a list about female empowerment that leaves out women who are not like her.
Saying the exclusivity of her list is wrong, is very different to saying that the way she lives her life is wrong.
She seems like an empowered woman to me - it would just be nice if she widened the scope of Girl Power to allow other kinds of women in.
Hope that clears things up :)
Whilst I agree with a lot of your article, I think you may have missed the point when criticising point 4 "an empowered woman IMPACTS future generations'. The author did not say "an empowered woman PRODUCES future generations' rather, used the term 'impacts' (ie. influences)
Pretty sure that Oprah, Helen Mirren and Chelsea Handler have impacted our generation.