By MELISSA WELLHAM
Condoms haven’t really changed much in the last, oh, forever.
Sure, now they come in a variety of flavours, colours and textures (vibrating, anyone?) but the basic principle of rubbery-sperm-stopping-ness remains the same.
Condoms are used by millions of people across the world (750 million people, in fact) and it’s a pretty unconcious, run of the mill thing for most of us here in the comfort of the first world.
But in the third? It’s not just about a fear of chlamydia or herpes (although, that’s serious enough in and of itself). No. In the third world, where HIV rates can be as high as 20 per cent – this is a matter of life and death. Encouraging people to wear and use condoms is absolutely critical.
And given that the usage rate just isn’t going up the way we’d like it to be, one man has decided it’s time for a redesign.
Enter: the saviour of sex for this generation. The lord of lovemaking. The messiah who is committed to increasing male pleasure. (And decreasing HIV, so all credit to him).
Bill Gates.
The founder of Microsoft (very big and profitable company, perhaps you’ve heard of them?) is offering up $100,000 of initial funding, followed by the opportunity to earn $1 million of continued funding, to the individual who can pitch him an idea for “the next generation of condoms”.
Condoms 2.0, if you will.
It’s a whole lot more exciting (and lucrative) than your grade 6 ‘build a volcano’ competition, that’s for sure.
Top Comments
We have been given out free condoms for 28 years as part of our safe sex drug safety work. Until we see condom 2.0 it is vital to remain mindful and careful: if it't not on, it's not on!
Grr it annoys me so much that every time condom drawbacks are mentioned, it's always stated that it decreases male pleasure. It decreases female pleasure too - myself and most of my friends HATE them for this reason. Are the people doing the research/ads/whatever not women? Or just not bothering to ask their female partners if the condom makes a difference to them? Or is it just not as important that female pleasure is decreased when compared to male pleasure?
A number of the men I've been with said they had no idea it decreases pleasure for women. It feels like a plastic bag is being rammed into you! I'm counting down the days until my pill kicks back in and I can ditch them...
The article quoted Bill saying that it decreases female pleasure, just like it does male. Scroll up and read properly??
Do you mean this quote?
"The primary drawback from the male perspective is that condoms decrease pleasure as compared to no condom...[Female condoms] suffer some of the same liabilities as male condoms, require proper insertion training and are substantially more expensive than their male counterparts.”
It specifically states that "from the male perspective" - the female perspective is NOT mentioned.
I think you might have misread 'female condoms' as meaning 'female pleasure'. Female condoms are a specific type of condom, which the female wears inside her vagina - as opposed to a male condom, which is one that goes over the penis. The quote states those condoms suffer the "same liabilities as male condoms" but again don't mention female pleasure.
Maybe you should scroll up and read properly. I don't mean that rudely - it's just that if you bother to comment, make sure you've read what you're commenting on properly.