Fact: A mother who is 35 when her child is born is more likely than not to have died by the time that child is 46.
The one who is 45 may have bowed out of her child’s life when he’s 37.
The odds are slightly worse for fathers: The 35-year-old new father can hope to live to see his child turn 42. The 45-year-old one has until the child is 33.
So writes Judith Sulevitz in The New Republic, in a sobering assessment of what the trend for delayed parenthood means for American society – and ours.
We’ve discussed it lots of times at Mamamia – the extraordinary advances in reproductive medicine that were unthinkable a generation ago. Fertility drugs, IVF. GIFT, egg freezing, surrogacy … It’s a big shift in the way we think and live. Sulevitz explains:
The twenties have turned into a lull in the life cycle, when many young men and women educate themselves and embark on careers or journeys of self-discovery, or whatever it is one does when not surrounded by diapers and toys.Study after study has shown that the children of older parents grow up in wealthier households, lead more stable lives, and do better in school – after all, their parents are grown-ups.
Unlike our grandmothers, women today face little social pressure to be married if they want to be mothers. Heck, in 2012, you could be a 46 year old lesbian mother of triplets and it wouldn’t even make the news. Why should it? If those kids are loved and wanted, where’s the downside?
Apparently, it will surface in about forty years – when those babies are in the prime of their lives and wishing their mum was around to pop the Champagne on their birthday, see them get married, hold their babies. The downside is today’s older parents miss out on enjoying their kids’ adulthood and the kids miss having their parents around.
Then there’s the whole sandwich generation thing. Pardon the pun, but it’s no picnic dropping a five year old at pre-school then schlepping across town to take your eighty-two year old father to the urologist.
‘Young’ grandparents (in their 50s and 60s) are gold – rare and valuable. They can babysit, play, drive, and most importantly, connect the generations. The way society is going, more and more children will never know their grandparents and if they do, it’s unlikely they’ll be offered a piggyback ride. That’s how hips get broken.
Top Comments
My Mum was 45 when she had me. Dad was 44. I was something of a surprise them. Apparently Chubby Checker was to blame as they started twisting and didn't stop (I met Chubby Checker in a lift 20 years ago and and thanked him, but I digress).
Mum and Dad were wonderful parents. I lost them both when I was my 30s, miss them still but would not have changed anything.
I have a good mate who raised a daughter on his own from his id-20s and who now, at 48 has 10 and 6 year old sons. They are very lucky. He is a great Dad and their Mum is lovely.
We have three sons, the youngest is 15 and I would love more kids but sadly we cannot (not sure my wife would be as keen even if we could!).
Do not be deterred from late parenthood. Just do the best you can.
Sure the statstics lean in favour of being a young parent physically but I think I would've been a terrible Mum in my twenties- far too impatient and selfish(that's just me not all Mum's in their 20's of course.) I had my two when I was 29 & then at 34. My kids might not get me for as long but they get a better more stable me for their younger years. Besides, statstics don't reflect the real ups and downs of life; I am motherless at 37 now because my mum died of cancer at 45 while her father, my grandfather is still alive and mobile at 85. I do believe the trend for later pregnancies runs alongside other new trends in health and exercise that mean we will begin to see longer lifespans with a longer period of quality, mobile living. My 67 year old father in law is superfit, exercises everyday and babysits my children regularly. Sure the Stats have some merit but really, who fits entirely into that box..?