UPDATED: Recently, this picture of a Melbourne kindergarten student after an anaphylaxis reaction has been making its way around the Internet:
Comparison image via ABC Online.
Five-year-old Amelie King was exposed to peanuts at school on Monday morning after coming into contact with a child who had been eating the food. When she was called to pick her child up from school early, Amelie’s mum Joanne assumed that Amelie must have been injured in the playground, and couldn’t believe when she saw that her child was undergoing a mild reaction.
Joanne posted the picture on Facebook with the caption: “Should a parent have to fear their child dying on the first day of school?”
___________________________________
In my opinion if you send your child to school with nuts in their lunch box when you know there are children in their class that have severe nut allergies and you’ve been informed that the classroom is a nut free zone; then you are a reckless, selfish and dangerous individual.
Usually I attempt to present my opinion in a calm and informed manner with respect shown to the opposite view point.
Not this time bitches, not this time.
I was chatting with a friend and she was telling me about some of her Facebook “friends” who post pictures of the healthy lunches they pack for their kids. (Seriously that kind of showing off is unnecessary. I mean well done, but ugh.)
Top Comments
Many if us struggle to put food on the table. We rack our brains trying to provide our kids with high protein snacks instead of pumping them up with carbs. So this means that my child is not entitled to a good nutrition which will probably lead to obesity or diabetes in the future? I think not.
Ive heard it all: shredded chicken, soy butter, etc. We barely get by month to month and we are expected to spend on these luxuries? Or screw it and give ur kids lunchables? Fruit with no protein? Pure carbs like crackers?
Even though we are poor, we do everything in our power to ensure our kids have a balanced diet, including not using the free lunch which is processed animal fat anyways. But no, thats not ok. Just because your kid has health issues does not give u a right to assume that a) we have the means to acccomodate such luxuries and b) are willing to let our own childs nutrition suffer, when we break our backs to provide them with the best we can. Im sorry our best isnt good enough for you. Im sorry out budget cant accomodate your needs. Im sorry i care about raising a healthy kid too. But not everything revolves around your issues. We have them too.
Does this make me a selfish, bad person? Just because the only way i can afford to provide for my children happens to clash with yours? Because maybe we have hardships that you dont know about we are evil for simply NOT having another healthy affordable option?
Lol sorry, have you seen the price of peanut butter or nuts lately? Clearly not. Do some research, you obviously are under the impression that a nut allergy is some sort of emerging 'fad'. Well it's not. Do you know what it's like to see a child with angioedema, urticaria, swollen lips, swollen tongues, with cyanosis saying that they can't breathe? Imagine if you didn't know your child had an allergy and had a severe reaction one day (BECAUSE THEY CAN EXACERBATE WITH EACH EXPOSURE TO NUTS), and you did not have an epipen? Research actually proves that symptoms can exacerbate and cause death between 5-35 minutes after a peanut exposure, if not treated straight away. Oh yeah, and if you do inject them with an epipen, don't forget to keep them supine, and not in an upright position after epinephrine injections, because this can also cause death. Could you not just get some jam instead?
Kemmer you are one stupid idiot.
All outside food is banned at our school because peanut allergies. The only problem is that people with DH and gluten allergies can't eat anything they serve as well as the dairy free ones.