by MIA FREEDMAN
From the moment I gave birth to a daughter, I knew this day would come. The conversation was crucial and it would have been negligent of me to avoid it. I just didn’t expect to be having it so soon; she’s only five!
“Darling,” I began gently one day, crouching down to her level to make eye contact as I held her hands tenderly in mine. “Leggings are not pants.”
As her face registered confusion, I seized the opportunity to continue. “You see, leggings are more like tights,” I explained carefully. “That means they’re different to jeans or pants. We don’t wear them the same way.” She regarded me defiantly. “But I like these leggings!” she protested. I remained calm, maintained eye contact, and spoke kindly yet firmly. “So do I darling, your leggings are lovely. They just need a skirt over the top of them. Or a dress. Heck, even a longer t-shirt.”
Reluctantly, she complied and I felt some small satisfaction in the same way I do on the rare occasion any child of mine eats a green vegetable. Mother Of The Year.
Afterwards though, I thought about our conversation and wondered if I’d made a mistake. Parenting is made up of a million doubtful moments like this and mostly, only your child’s future therapist will be able to say how badly you screwed up.
Was it wrong to impose my views about leggings onto my daughter? Had I crushed her little spirit? Or was it my duty as a parent, hell as a woman, to pass on the single fashion philosophy I live by?
Top Comments
The problem with the "leggings aren't pants" argument is that it is based on people's sense of "decency": what parts of a persons' body are deemed acceptable or attractive. While it's not on par with freedom to express political views or to choose your own religion, there is a freedom of expression issue here. While I doubt anyone goes into this much premeditation when getting dressed, wearing leggings as pants is a reflection or expression of one person's comfort with their own body and/or belief in the practicality of wearing leggings. I once heard an academic (who's name I forgot) point out that you have the right to freedom of expression, but you do not have the right to not be offended by other people's expression. Therefore, I believe that I have the right to express my own comfort with my body by wearing leggings as pants as I wish without being relentlessly put down for it. That's not to say that you can't have your own opinion about it, but I think that the "it's not fashionable and it makes you look ugly" argument against leggings as pants verges on making people feel ashamed of expressing their comfort with their own bodies, and that's a little unfair. Your being offended by the sight of a persons body should not be a reason for them refraining from wearing clothes that they find comfortable, any more than me not liking the way a baggy shirt makes your body look should stop you from wearing that shirt. Because it's not my business to dictate what you should wear.
This DOES become more complicated when one considers whether or not to pass on values around these topics to a child, and to be honest, even the "leggings are not pants" anecdote was only intended to be an example, I think it's an extremely good one: it's a seemingly minor issue that can have deeper implications and a really great example of the dilemmas of raising a child.
Wow at some of the comments. Especially the reply blog posts and some of the comments on those posts, from people who OBVIOUSLY have not read the original post.
No wonder a recurring theme at Mamamia is the 'Mummy wars'. Give people a little slack with their opinions, people!
The world will be a much nicer place without you exaggerating what people have said in order to more easily tear it down. That's called a 'Strawman' argument, and adds very little to any sort of debate.
Take a chill pill, please, then return with something constructive to say about what is actually written ... not a hyperbolic message which you have imagined out of a perfectly reasonable post.