Tony Abbott is finally on board with reducing family violence – so why is everyone so suspicious?
Yesterday Prime Minister Tony Abbott stood up and made a commitment to reducing family violence in this country.
He said: “Something like one in three Australian women has suffered violence in a domestic context through her lifetime.”
“I am the father of three daughters, I am the brother of three sisters. The last thing I want to see tolerated is violence against women and children.”
At yesterday’s press conference, the PM committed to asking state and territory leaders to agree on a national scheme for domestic violence orders. He also said we needed to look at consistent penalties for breaking protection orders because “[i]If you’re a repeat drink driver, you really have the book thrown at you. But if you breach domestic violence orders, often there are hardly any consequences.”
All of this is true.
We should be celebrating that this issue is receiving national attention.
And we would be.
If.
If the announcement hadn’t been made by someone who over the last 12 months as Minister for the Status of Women has overseen the defunding of a number of services that are essential to supporting women leaving violent relationships.
We might have cheered a welcome change of heart from a government that has, since its election, neglected this vital area.
But.
But for the fact that the initiative was almost a word-for-word re-announcement of an initiative agreed by all Australian governments in a national commitment five years ago (the 2010 agreement committed to “a national approach to domestic and family violence protection orders” and “strong penalties for repeat offences and breaches of sentencing and protective orders”).
Top Comments
Suspicious because he is a lying liar who lies, and represents a party that lives and breathes the 'it must be your fault' line, you know, if you are abused, poor, mentally ill, physically ill, hit by a bus, hit by a person, lose your job, don't have a job, are homeless, aren't white, aren't a Liberal..
I don't agree with any form of domestic violence, I fear we are forgetting that men too are victims of domestic violence. I was in a home where the female was the violent one who hit the man who was too decent to fight back and too scared to stand up for himself. What that women did to him and us (her children) was disgusting. Domestic violence needs to be tackled together and anger management/programs need to be for everyone not just "men", and help needs to be made available for everyone not just "women". Ill probably cop some sort of flack but I lived through domestic violence where the women was the violent one and I have the same situation where my neighbour who is female attacks her children and (male) partner. (has been reported on many occasions). The end game here should be that the perpetrators need to be made responsible for their actions, they need stronger laws and punishments and better prevention/rehabilitation programs, better security and support for the victims.