Having served less time as PM than Julia Gillard, is Tony Abbott now staring down the barrel of a one term government?
BY Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra
The rout in Queensland is shocking news for Tony Abbott. It will terrify federal backbenchers and further destabilise his leadership.
It puts up in lights that the unpopular federal Coalition could easily become a one term government.
That the Liberal National Party would be on the brink of losing Queensland – with the ABC’s Antony Green predicting a Labor win as the most likely outcome – was almost inconceivable before the vote, given the massive majority that Campbell Newman won just three years ago. A swing of more than 11% to the ALP in one election is mind-blowing.
Read more: Queensland Election: Can Campbell Newman still be Premier if he loses his seat?
Newman’s unceremonious demise in his seat of Ashgrove had been on the cards; he was on the nose in the electorate and Labor’s Kate Jones, a former minister in the Bligh government, had run an intense and effective grassroots campaign.
State factors – especially the government’s assets leasing plan, Newman’s cuts and his arrogant style – were the primary drivers of the Queensland result, as Labor’s Wayne Swan conceded on ABC TV.
But Abbott is clothed in some of the blame and, given his weakened position, the implications for him will be very serious.
Abbott was totally banned from the campaign because he was considered toxic by the Queensland LNP. His knighthood for Prince Philip was a distraction in the final week and particularly bad for Newman’s seat. The government’s to-ing and fro-ing over Medicare could not have been worse timing.
Top Comments
I suppose that it is possible. After all, we did have one term Kevin and one term Julia. Whoever follows will be a one term wonder as well if history is the guide. The next Labor PM is also likely to be a one termer especially when you consider that there won't be a surplus to inherit to buy votes with.
Can't stand Tony Abbott, but here's the thing you can't place all the blame at the feet of the leader of a party. Yes some leaders are more responsible than others , and certainly a leader has (you would think) more say than anyone else in the party, but these people do not act in a vacumn. It doesn't matter which leader or what party we are talking, they are just one clog in their party, they may be the most important clog and most influential but they are still just part of their party, and the rest of the party still have a similar ideology to the person on charge.
According to Hockey's book, Tony Abbott dreamed up the PPL all on his own and only told Rupert Murdoch before announcing the policy publicly. And that was considered a signature policy.
But you are right to some extent. The other cogs should have kicked this cog out a long time ago. Now they all look crooked.