by LANA HIRSCHOWITZ
There are three very different types of flyers.
There are those who don’t think about the journey at all, they just need to get from point A to B. Then there are the people who quite like being on a plane, they either understand aeronautics or don’t think about it.
Then there are people like me who are so scared that all they can do is pray. And drink. And sob.
People like me don’t make very good companions on a flight. But people like my husband – who understands how planes stay in the air – make excellent companions. He is calm, friendly and reassuring. He also loves children so he would be the perfect person to sit next to a child on a flight.
The problem is that he is a man and according to the policies of some airlines – that makes him a potential paedophile.
Statistics bear this out: the vast majority of people who sexually abuse children are male.
In April this year, a 33 year old fireman named Johnny McGirr boarded a Virgin Australia flight from Brisbane, where he sat next to two unaccompanied minors (who he has estimated were aged between eight and ten).
I am not sure what kind of flyer Johnny was but that seemed to be irrelevant. He was a man and so he was asked by the staff to move away from the boys. Seriously. Just because he was a man.
Top Comments
Who's the Virgin dufus seat allocation person attendant who didn't sort this out way way prior to people even beginning to board the plane????? Shame a company with a policy in place (!!!!!!) can't sort out very simple seating logistics before making a spectacle on the plane. When minors are allocated seats allocate them next to a female (as ridiculous as the whole policy is) not someone named Johnny!!!!!!!! Or reserve the seat next to them and allocate later. Not that hard.
Or don't be so bloody sexist as to have a sexist policy that tells the male children "when you grow up, I think you're going to be child molesters"
Surely all this hysteria is unnecessary. It is not that this man was asked to move, it was the way the attendant said "because HE is not allowed to sit next to minors". Not "the airline has a policy that unaccompanied minors are not to sit next men", the attendant handled it badly and publicly embarrassed this poor man unnecessarily. I do not agree with the policy but I always thought these types of policies were based on some number cruncher working out the likelihood of something happening and the likely cost to the airline if it did. (I watch too much Air Crash Investigation)