The Malaysian government has confirmed that flight MH370 was deliberately interfered with – and with that confirmation, have come new theories about the disappearance of the jet.
Malaysia’s Prime Minister Najib Razak has revealed that investigators have not pinpointed a specific explanation, but have widened the search for the location of the plane to two corridors: the Kazakhstan-Turkmenistan border area, and a swathe from Indonesia to southern India.
“Despite media reports that the plane was hijacked, we are investigating all major possibilities on what caused MH370 to deviate,” the Prime Minister said. While conspiracy theories abound, these are five of the major theories regarding the disappearance of MH370 that authorities are currently investigating.
1. The pilot hijacked Malaysia Airlines MH370.
US intelligence forces believe that the pilot and co-pilot may be responsible.
Prime Minister Najib Razak has revealed that communications were deliberately turned off “by someone on the plane”. The Prime Minister further confirmed that “deliberate actions” were behind the plane’s disappearance.
A US official has told CNN that they believe pilot Captain Zaharie Shah and his co-pilot Fariq Abdul were responsible for the disappearance of the plane.
Police are reportedly investigating whether 53-year-old Captain Shah may have hijacked his own plane as a political protest – to show support for Malaysia’s opposition leader, Anwar Ibrahim.
Co-pilot Fariq Abdul, 27, has also been investigated, and it has been revealed that on previous flights he invited passengers into the cockpit of the plane.
Top Comments
It is all very sad and strange.
Who knew anything or anyone could actually still go missing on planet earth with all the surveillance (visual and otherwise)? I didn't even think it was possible.
Then again, who knows, maybe it's not really technically missing... I'm willing to bet there's far more intelligence and confirmed facts on this than any of us will ever be privy to, even the families. If it had been swiftly shot down for example, would any nation admit to that publicly? There's a lot at stake politically.
If it is a hijack or a political thing, doesn't that mean that someone should take responsibility/make demands? or perhaps there is one person on the plane that wanted to make sure the plane ended up somewhere other than its intended destination. I keep coming back to the "where is the demand"/the "look at what we can do"….I don't have a theory to throw into the ring, but this aspect is troubling me.
Well it would depend on why it was hijacked - what if it wasn't so much about kidnapping the people on board but if 'they' mainly wanted to covertly re-purpose the aircraft for criminal use? That could take time (more than a week)