UPDATE:
FRIDAY: Kevin Rudd has announced he will contest the leadership on Monday at 10am and given a commitment that he will leave the issue for good if he should lose.
“Today in Australia we face some serious challenges.
All indications are we are heading for the rocks at the next election, leaving the country to ravages of Abbott, the most conservative, most right wing Government in Australian history.
That’s why I am here today … things need to change.
Rightly or wrongly, Julia has lost the trust of the Australian people and starting on Monday I have decided to restore that trust. I have decided to contest ballot on Monday.
I want to finish job the Australian people elected me to do when I was elected by them to become PM.
Many of my colleagues have encouraged me to do just that. I was elected in 2007 to govern for all Australians and that is what we did. The record is a good record.
I’ve spoken up for democracy everywhere in the world, but it’s most important we have one at home, in my party. Australia’s are sick and tired of outside forces calling the shots. Our greatest gift of democracy and to democracy is the secret ballot. And we should have that on Monday. We should have freedom of intimidation from factions. Their pre-selections should not be threatened by how they vote.
No one should live in fear. I call for a secret ballot. A truly, secret ballot. I would call on the PM to ensure that candidates, and perhaps their might be more, have the opportunity to speak and address the party before the ballot is taken so people can make an informed choice.
Top Comments
HI there
we didnot vote for Julia to become PM in 2007
she has no right to be PM
people elect PM not party
we the people of australia voted labor becuase we wanted Kevin rudd to be pM not Julia Idiots don't u understand
RE: ‘Kevin Rudd’s NINE HOURS of . . . ?’
What qualities / or lack thereof are showcased in the account (below )
. . . NINE hours of Mr Rudd’s time in Washington?
How appropriate were his behaviours in response to:-
i) criticism (egregious as it was)
ii) lack of Prime Ministerial support
Did he make an appropriate ministerial response? Subjected to vile criticism and not supported by his Prime Minister, Mr Rudd’s response was to firstly ditch his current job and related serious commitments and position himself for the PM’s job.
Was this a mature response to the situation? Was it:-
rational / irrational?
appropriate / inappropriate?
responsible / irresponsible?
As a response to criticism and lack of support, does not Mr Rudd’s behaviour
showcase his :-
Wilfulness?
Egocentricism?
Chaotic decision making?
Impropriety?
Impetuosity?
Lack of discipline?
Emotional immaturity?
Poor anger management?
Is his behaviour perhaps an indication that Mr Rudd, his anger
out of control, does indeed become ‘unhinged’ when stressed?
And that chaotic decision making is one outcome . . .
Kevin Rudd’s NINE HOURS of . . . ?
Kevin Rudd arrived in Washington last Tuesday, 21st February at 4pm US time.
He had a 90 minute dinner meeting at the Pentagon with Kim Beazley, (Australia’s Ambassador to the USA) Leon Panetta (US Secretary of Defence) and key staff from the US defence department.
He returned to his hotel room at 9pm.
A few hours later and without prior notice/discussion, he resigned as Minister of Foreign Affairs in a speech made from his hotel at 1.20am Wednesday.
He announced that his duties in Washington would be performed by Mr. Beazley
and
those in London would be performed by the permanent Secretary of his department.
Some meetings appear to have been cancelled.
(Note: In September 2009, Kevin Rudd appointed Beazley as Australia's Ambassador to the USA. The appointment began in February 2010.)
It would be interesting to know if Mr Rudd had talked about his intentions prior to making his resignation speech. At what point did Kim Beazley learn that he’d be standing in for Kevin in Washington the very next day?
Indeed, how much of everything did Mr. Rudd tell Kim Beazley?
Serious commitments ditched by Mr Rudd due to his resignation were :-
a)talks in London on the future of Somalia !!! and piracy !!! in the Indian Ocean
b) talks in Tunis regarding the future of Syria !!!
In a nutshell:-
Kevin Rudd’s response to Wayne Swan et alii was to
a)ditch his significant responsibilities,
b) resign without notice
c) position himself for a campaign / challenge of Julia Gillard’s Prime Ministership.
Do we not have here evidence of serious mental/emotional deficits which support the credibility of Julia Gillard, Nicola Roxon and others.
In a word (or two) :- ‘Loose Cannon’