I’m new here. I recently arrived from the UK and I’ve been lucky enough to be surrounded by great people that made my move easy, painless and stress-free. On arriving, while I was VERY comfortable dossing on my mates’ sofa, I couldn’t help but notice that it was something on the coffee table that wasn’t sitting well.
It was DNA. Australia’s best selling magazine for gay men. And, there was Stefan Gatt adorning the front cover.
Now, I had perceptions of what guys would look like in Australia. British beer belly they would not be. And, I admit I hit the gym rather hard in London before I relocated because I wanted to be “up to standard”. But, those were my standards – and my aspirations.
This was different. I found myself distracted. How was this dude so perfect? “I’m off to the gym” I announced – “alright, sweets – have a good one”, the response.
For me, the gym’s always been a great place to think. So I got to thinking. I’m not an irrational person. I know that boy on the cover is airbrushed. Either that or he has no pores. What am I doing here benching my own body weight at 8.15 on a Sunday morning?
It kept happening – finding myself in the gym as a result of the bloody coffee table dude. This wasn’t aspiration. This was obsession. I’m in marketing – I should be immune to this type of influence. But what was he selling? Nothing? Himself? The magazine? The magazine. So what’s the positive sentiment of this piece? Is there any takeaway value? Eurgh. Let’s not go there.
Top Comments
This is why happy staying away from my fellow gays, the gay community and major cities - they are there only to make you feel worse about yourself. The community isn't really a "community" but a group of equally dysfunctional people who migrate towards one another and feed off their own insecurities
Matt, I honestly don't understand your perspective at all.
You feel inadequate at the sight of this magazine cover and it makes you go work out, but your focus is on airbrushing? I'd ask you to take another look at said magazine and the model. The model has an incredible body, and he is very handsome. The airbrushing represents very little of what makes him desirable and hence, enviable. Note how you go work out after looking at the model - you don't go scrubbing your face.
This man probably looks incredibly in real life - and he would probably arouse just as much envy from you, without Photoshop or soft lighting. I think your trying to come to terms with the power of beauty by pretending that it isn't real, and finding a scapegoat (the magazine). These words aren't intended to be mean, and I'm interested in your response.