There are 15,000 kids in long-term out-of-home care – how can we fix it?
Across Australia almost 50,000 children are living in out-of-home care – in foster care, or with relatives – and 15,000 of those children have been away from their birth families for more than two years.
They are unlikely to return home, and yet adoption rates are shockingly low.
Advocates say Australia’s adoption system needs fixing.
“For those children in out of home care for long periods are spending time in six or more places – there’s a real lack of stability that has a big effect on a child. Where it is appropriate, there has to be a way for adoption to be considered for them,” Jane Hunt, head of Adopt Change says.
“What we want is a system that responds to the children’s needs – there are currently 15,000 children in care for over two years, if you contrast that with domestic adoptions last year, there were just 203. So clearly that path is blocked.”
The tragic case this week of 12-year-old foster child Tiahleigh Palmer, found dead after going missing on her way to school, has highlighted the lengths of time children can spend in foster care.
“Reunification or restoration with birth families is really important but you need, there needs to be, a time where you stop that because the children are being harmed by being in temporary care,” Ms Hunt said.
Top Comments
There is also a lot of confusion about the difference between 'adoption' and 'foster care' (and not helped by people confusing Australia and the US). An adopted child is legally your child. A foster child is legally not.
We've had my (foster) sisters for 15(ish) years (two of them are now adults). Adoption isn't the"next step" (at least in WA, NT, or SA) in Australia. This is even when 18 year orders have been made (ie that it is most likely the child is yours until they are an adult). Unlike in the US where you see the "XXXX number of days in foster care now I have my forever home" posts.
My sisters have been my sisters almost their entire lives but they were legally wards of the state until they turned 18.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert by any means. Just what I have learned by being a by-stander to the system and having a few family members and friends foster.
What we want is a society that acknowledges the needs of the child from birth, for the continuity of the safety of the womb. Sure - sometimes parenting is less than ideal, but people can learn - look at the programs we air on TV about families who are willing to learn, and parenting classes such as circle of security.
Jeremy Sammut would have a two class system where parents are judged as incompetent and their babies are removed without a chance to change, or a chance for family to be involved, because there are 'good' parents wanting children and waiting for children to adopt.
This is another forced adoption era all over again. As a researcher, has he learnt nothing from history?