Journalists are suddenly as vilified as politicians. This is not an entirely surprising position for us to be in (yes, I do consider myself a journalist, it’s what I write in the ‘occupation’ bit of forms so it must be true) because traditionally, journalists have not topped the list of most-trusted professions.
But this is different. Since the News Of The World (NOTW) hacking scandal has intensified and recieved global coverage these past few weeks, journalists in Australia are being accused – explicitly and implicitly- of some heinous things. Crimes, in fact.
I do not work for News Ltd. In fact I currently work for one of his competitors – Fairfax publish my newspaper column and I used to work for another of his competitors, ACP Magazines.
So I am not writing this post to apologise for Rupert or News Corp and certainly not for the actions of anyone at NOTW. Hacking into the phones of any person – famous, civilian, dead or alive – is appalling and inexcusable. That’s why Britain is having all manner of police and parliamentary enquiries into this scandal. And so they bloody well should.
However. There are a couple of important points that are being lost as some opportunists seek to draw a line between journalism in the UK and Australia as if we were talking about the same climate, the same media culture. We’re not.
When it was announced that News International were closing NOTW a couple of weeks ago and British media and politicians exploded with references to the “disgust of the British people”, someone on Twitter remarked sarcastically that they thought the British people would express their disgust by buying every single copy of the last edition of NOTW.
Top Comments
I'm a media analyst, working in London, with all the major players in this drama as my clients.
I haven't had more than 3 hours sleep for three weeks (except for my trip to Paris on the weekend which I insisted on taking). I haven't seen daylight this week.
I have read/ listened to/ watched more on this issue than any person would consider reasonable. There's some excellent reporting going on right now, so credit to those journos. Unfortunately, there's also some pretty sketchy stuff happening (on both sides of the argument).
We think a lot has gone down in the last few weeks but the truth is this is only the beginning. There's a whole lot more where this came from.
Can I just say that I am SO. SICK. OF. RUPERT. MURDOCH.
Whinge over - I'm going back to my cave built from hacking scandal press clippings...
"My point is this: if there is no demand for a product, it doesn’t exist. If public attitudes and mores don’t embrace a certain type of content, it won’t be produced."
This is a little disingenuous. Nothing is that black-and-white. The media create "demand" for deeply ingrained cultural reasons, or to please advertisers, or to cater to a vocal minority. A lot of the problematic issues in our culture cited on this website (body image, sexualisation of girls, etc) would fall into this category. Who is demanding to see very thin models? It isn't audiences.
Here, here. I havent read all the comments, but from what I have seen, this is the most astute. I hate the whole 'we ask for it' line, as if corporates and conglomerates etc are just merely abiding our little wishes.....pah!